2013
DOI: 10.1016/j.hrthm.2013.02.019
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Impact of the Advisa MRI pacing system on the diagnostic quality of cardiac MR images and contraction patterns of cardiac muscle during scans: Advisa MRI randomized clinical multicenter study results

Abstract: In the Advisa MRI study, high-quality CMR images for the assessment of cardiac anatomy and function were obtained in most patients with an implantable pacing system. In addition, this study demonstrated the feasibility of acquiring tagging data to study the LV function during pacing.

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1

Citation Types

6
21
0

Year Published

2014
2014
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
5
3

Relationship

2
6

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 45 publications
(27 citation statements)
references
References 25 publications
6
21
0
Order By: Relevance
“…With recently-established quality criteria applied (9), a score $3 (i.e., artifacts in $3 slices) was obtained in only 2 participants (6% of study participants). The standard cine CMR technique is known to yield good image quality in patients equipped with MR-conditional pacemakers(21), and similarly, an excellent quality was achieved with the CS approach in a pacemakerimplanted patient as illustrated inFigure 4. The high image quality of the CS technique translated into high agreement for LVEF, with a mean difference versus the standard multi-breath-hold technique of 1.3% (95% confidence interval [CI]: À7.2% to þ9.7%).…”
mentioning
confidence: 84%
“…With recently-established quality criteria applied (9), a score $3 (i.e., artifacts in $3 slices) was obtained in only 2 participants (6% of study participants). The standard cine CMR technique is known to yield good image quality in patients equipped with MR-conditional pacemakers(21), and similarly, an excellent quality was achieved with the CS approach in a pacemakerimplanted patient as illustrated inFigure 4. The high image quality of the CS technique translated into high agreement for LVEF, with a mean difference versus the standard multi-breath-hold technique of 1.3% (95% confidence interval [CI]: À7.2% to þ9.7%).…”
mentioning
confidence: 84%
“…2,3 The susceptibility artefacts ( Figure 5) represent a major concern at high magnetic fields (e.g. 3 T), particularly when using balanced steady-state free precession sequences ( Figure 6) or when scanning patients with pacemakers 5 or implantable cardioverter defibrillator ( Figure 7). These artefacts can also be exaggerated when using single-shot echoplanar sequences and long echo times.…”
Section: 3mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…With the new generation of MRconditional pacemakers, high-quality images of the heart are obtained even for steady-state free precession acquisitions. 5 Chemical shift artefact These artefacts are common and manifest as either bright and dark lines on both sides of fat-water interfaces (first type) or signal void in gradient recall-echo imaging (out of phase) (second type). Inherent differences in the precessional rates of fat and water in an applied magnetic field result in spatial shifts in the frequency-encoding direction.…”
Section: 3mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Future studies also should be performed to confirm that image quality with cardiac implanted electronic devices can be maintained to a sufficiently high quality to be clinically useful. 12 As MRI scanner technology advances, more safety studies and device modifications will be needed to maintain safety with more powerful scanners and new scan protocols and sequences.…”
Section: Future Studiesmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…8,9 Recently, pacemakers specifically designed for the MRI environment have been shown to be safe under certain conditions and to maintain image quality. [10][11][12] The ProMRI/ProMRI AFFIRM studies are prospective single-arm, nonrandomized, multicenter multinational studies designed to demonstrate the clinical safety of the ProMRI s Pacemaker System (Evia/Entovis SR-T and DR-T with Setrox/Safio S 53-cm/60-cm leads; Biotronik, Berlin, Germany) when used under specific 1.5-T MRI conditions (ClinicalTrial.gov Identifiers: NCT01460992 and NCT01761162).…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%