2012
DOI: 10.1093/ntr/nts218
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Impact of the 2011 Spanish Smoking Ban in Hospitality Venues: Indoor Secondhand Smoke Exposure and Influence of Outdoor Smoking

Abstract: SHS exposure in hospitality venues dramatically decreased after the 2011 Spanish smoking ban. SHS from outdoor smokers close to entrances seems to drift inside venues. Smoking control legislation should consider outdoor restrictions to ensure complete protection against SHS.

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
1
1

Citation Types

1
19
0
1

Year Published

2013
2013
2018
2018

Publication Types

Select...
9

Relationship

0
9

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 40 publications
(21 citation statements)
references
References 14 publications
1
19
0
1
Order By: Relevance
“…This is in contrast to the PM 2.5 concentrations in the conventional cigarette user's home, which were 58 times higher than in the e-cigarette user home. The air nicotine concentrations in the homes of smokers of conventional cigarettes were similar to the concentrations that have been observed in hospitality venues when smoking was allowed [14].…”
Section: Discussionsupporting
confidence: 77%
“…This is in contrast to the PM 2.5 concentrations in the conventional cigarette user's home, which were 58 times higher than in the e-cigarette user home. The air nicotine concentrations in the homes of smokers of conventional cigarettes were similar to the concentrations that have been observed in hospitality venues when smoking was allowed [14].…”
Section: Discussionsupporting
confidence: 77%
“…This led Spanish legislators to change the smoke-free law in January 2011, extending the total ban to all enclosed areas including bars, discos, restaurants and even hospitals campus and healthcare centers. In 2012, Lopez et al showed that SHS exposure in LH settings was dramatically reduced after the 2011 Spanish smoking ban was introduced [29]. High rates of compliance with smoke-free law (92.3%) were also observed in public places of a North India district, revealing the effectiveness of ban policies [11].…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Two samplers were used in passive mode and two were connected to pumps for active mode. Active sampling was conducted at a sampling rate of 3 L/min as previously described by Lopez et al [21]. Two field blanks were collected for quality control.…”
Section: Samplingmentioning
confidence: 99%