2017
DOI: 10.1061/(asce)co.1943-7862.0001219
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Impact of Team Integration and Group Cohesion on Project Delivery Performance

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1
1

Citation Types

2
70
0
8

Year Published

2017
2017
2022
2022

Publication Types

Select...
5
3
2

Relationship

1
9

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 137 publications
(93 citation statements)
references
References 29 publications
2
70
0
8
Order By: Relevance
“…For example, the contract type (Moore and Dainty 2001), or the quality of the project participants as well as their BIM maturity (Kassem and Succar 2017). The contract defining the project delivery impacts the team integration and group cohesion (Franz et al 2016). For example, with a design-build delivery, all actors join the project during the design phase, changing their relationships.…”
Section: The Notion Of Flow and The Importance Of Information Flowmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…For example, the contract type (Moore and Dainty 2001), or the quality of the project participants as well as their BIM maturity (Kassem and Succar 2017). The contract defining the project delivery impacts the team integration and group cohesion (Franz et al 2016). For example, with a design-build delivery, all actors join the project during the design phase, changing their relationships.…”
Section: The Notion Of Flow and The Importance Of Information Flowmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Design management of international hydropower EPC project starts from reviewing conceptual design for contractor-designer alliance to win EPC contracts [15]. Alliance can help contractors and designers to adequately consider the concerns of each other, and then appropriately decide the depth and responsibility of design in EPC contracts [19,55]. Nevertheless, EPC contracts will leave many uncertainties owing to some clients' requirements and needs being unable to be elaborated at the beginning of project implementation [56].…”
Section: Design Managementmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Asmar et al 2013found significantly lower RFI processing times and fewer resubmittals on Integrated Project Delivery (IPD) and "IPD-ish" projects, when compared to Design-Bid-Build (DBB) and Construction Manager at Risk (CMR). Most recently, Franz et al (2017) demonstrate that timely communication is reflective of the cohesiveness of the team and is a significant contributor to cost and quality outcomes. Communication was improved when the primary contractor and select specialty trades were involved early in the design process.…”
Section: Role Of Project Delivery Systemsmentioning
confidence: 99%