2011
DOI: 10.1086/657632
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Impact of Switching from an Open to a Closed Infusion System on Rates of Central Line–Associated Bloodstream Infection: A Meta-analysis of Time-Sequence Cohort Studies in 4 Countries

Abstract: Switching from an open to a closed infusion container resulted in a striking reduction in the overall CLABSI incidence and all-cause ICU mortality. Data suggest that open infusion containers are associated with a greatly increased risk of infusion-related bloodstream infection and increased ICU mortality that have been unrecognized. Furthermore, data suggest CLABSIs are associated with significant attributable mortality.

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

1
29
0
1

Year Published

2013
2013
2018
2018

Publication Types

Select...
9

Relationship

0
9

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 27 publications
(31 citation statements)
references
References 52 publications
1
29
0
1
Order By: Relevance
“…7,8,14 More recently, closed infusion containers have been shown to reduce the risk of central line-associated BSI compared with open systems. [15][16][17] Similarly, patients receiving premixed parenteral nutrition solutions have been shown to have a substantially reduced risk of BSI relative to those receiving traditionally compounded parenteral nutrition. 18 Whether or not other delivery systems that limit manual admixture of drug and solution have a beneficial impact on BSI rates has not been extensively examined.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…7,8,14 More recently, closed infusion containers have been shown to reduce the risk of central line-associated BSI compared with open systems. [15][16][17] Similarly, patients receiving premixed parenteral nutrition solutions have been shown to have a substantially reduced risk of BSI relative to those receiving traditionally compounded parenteral nutrition. 18 Whether or not other delivery systems that limit manual admixture of drug and solution have a beneficial impact on BSI rates has not been extensively examined.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Use of closed collapsible flexible containers instead of open semi-rigid vented or glass vented IV containers [19]. …”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Central lines increase the risk of bloodstream infections. [12,13] Known risk factors for CLABSI include administration of TPN, [12,13] frequent manipulation of the line, [14] open vascular systems, [15] not using needleless connections [6] and the use of multiple access ports. [6] Conflicting data exist on which type of central line is associated with the highest risk for CLABSI and when prolonged catheter dwell time becomes a risk factor.…”
Section: Researchmentioning
confidence: 99%