1994
DOI: 10.1080/03610929408831328
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Impact of surviving time on tests for carcinogenicity

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1

Citation Types

0
1
0

Year Published

1998
1998
2005
2005

Publication Types

Select...
2

Relationship

0
2

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 2 publications
(1 citation statement)
references
References 6 publications
0
1
0
Order By: Relevance
“…2536 Heimann and It distinguishes between tumors classified as fatal and tumors classified as incidental, and combines standard tests for fatal tumors (the logrank test) and incidental tumors (the Mantel-Haenszel test) to an overall test. This combined test is now widely recommended (see Fairweather et al, 1998), and has been discussed extensively in the literature (Chen and Moore, 1994;Graves and Pazdan, 1995;Heimann and Neuhaus, 2001;Lagakos and Louis, 1988;Lin and Ali, 1994;McKnight and Wahrendorf, 1992, and many others). Heimann and Neuhaus (2001) introduced a rigorous mathematical model to describe censored data arising from carcinogenicity assays, and they investigated the asymptotic distribution of Peto's combined test under different assumptions on the censoring distributions.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…2536 Heimann and It distinguishes between tumors classified as fatal and tumors classified as incidental, and combines standard tests for fatal tumors (the logrank test) and incidental tumors (the Mantel-Haenszel test) to an overall test. This combined test is now widely recommended (see Fairweather et al, 1998), and has been discussed extensively in the literature (Chen and Moore, 1994;Graves and Pazdan, 1995;Heimann and Neuhaus, 2001;Lagakos and Louis, 1988;Lin and Ali, 1994;McKnight and Wahrendorf, 1992, and many others). Heimann and Neuhaus (2001) introduced a rigorous mathematical model to describe censored data arising from carcinogenicity assays, and they investigated the asymptotic distribution of Peto's combined test under different assumptions on the censoring distributions.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%