2017
DOI: 10.1016/j.foodpol.2017.08.019
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Impact of survey design in the estimation of habitual food consumption

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
8
0

Year Published

2017
2017
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
7

Relationship

0
7

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 12 publications
(8 citation statements)
references
References 11 publications
0
8
0
Order By: Relevance
“…The role of recall error in survey data has been explored in a range of topics, including consumption expenditure and food intake (e.g. Beegle et al, 2012b;Troubat and Grünberger, 2017;Backiny-Yetna et al, 2017;Brzozowski et al, 2017;Engle-Stone et al, 2017;D'Alessio, 2017;Schündeln, 2018;Zezza et al, 2017), household enterprises (De Mel et al, 2009;Liedholm, 1991) and income measurement (Moore et al, 2000).…”
Section: Background and Related Literaturementioning
confidence: 99%
“…The role of recall error in survey data has been explored in a range of topics, including consumption expenditure and food intake (e.g. Beegle et al, 2012b;Troubat and Grünberger, 2017;Backiny-Yetna et al, 2017;Brzozowski et al, 2017;Engle-Stone et al, 2017;D'Alessio, 2017;Schündeln, 2018;Zezza et al, 2017), household enterprises (De Mel et al, 2009;Liedholm, 1991) and income measurement (Moore et al, 2000).…”
Section: Background and Related Literaturementioning
confidence: 99%
“…It is not immediately clear why over-reporting would affect multi-person households to a lesser extent than single-person households, but this may have to do with accuracy that is incurred by the cognitive exercise of distinguishing and dividing consumption among each household member in a multi-person household, while those living alone might rely on less enumerative rules-of-thumb. Recall error is mitigated by the use of prospective instruments such as the HSES-HH’s consumption diary, but these are conversely more likely to be affected by underreporting due to respondent burden [ 21 ]. Both retrospective and prospective assessment methods are also subject to some measure of social desirability bias (the latter by way of respondent “self-monitoring”) [ 38 ], however, research is lacking on the importance of this bias in assessing diet and household food consumption in Mongolia.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Efforts to improve the accuracy of household food consumption measurements are ongoing and have considered such cognitive and survey design [ 7 , 39 ]. In Mongolia, recent analysis by Troubat and colleagues suggests that the HSES-HH’s diary instrument could be satisfactorily substituted with a less costly consumption recall combined with measurement of changes in household foods stocks and acquisitions [ 21 ].…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…Economic factors include income, development, urban-rural economic differences, price, and markets (Zhai et al, 2009;Zhen et al, 2010a;Baquedano and Liefert, 2014;Csutora and Vetőné Mózner, 2014;Chaves et al, 2017); social factors include those related to an aging population, urbanization, cultural diversity, and festivals (Han, 2013;Hu, 2016;Deng et al, 2018;Nikolay, 2018); ecological factors include seasonal variations, land-use diversity, climate, and the environment (de Ruiter et al, 2014;Hu, 2016;. Data from statistics, questionnaires, and remote sensing are the most commonly used data sources for studies on food consumption impact factors (Rasmussen et al, 2016;Troubat and Grünberger, 2017;Zhen et al, 2018;Li et al, 2019). Nevertheless, studies on the perception of food consumption impact factors of stakeholders remain insufficient, and in the Xilin Gol Grassland there is an obvious lack of qualitative and quantitative analyses on food consumption impact factors applying effective approaches.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%