Impact of Surveillance Stool Culture Guided Selection of Antibiotics in Allogeneic Hematopoietic Stem Cell Transplant Patients

Abstract

INTRODUCTION Allogeneic stem cell transplant (allo-SCT) patients are at high risk for severe life threatening bacterial infections. Although the prevalence and pattern of resistance varies among centres and countries, there is a growing global problem of resistance to antibiotics. The consequent increased use of broad spectrum antibiotics and injudicious antibiotic policies have contributed to the selection of multidrug resistant (MDR) pathogens. Translocation of organisms which normally colonize the gut into the bloodstream during the febrile neutropenia (FN) has long been postulated as a pathogenic factor for life threatening gram negative infections. This hypothesis had led to utilization of various methods of peritransplant gut decontamination. Our centre has a policy of performing surveillance stool cultures for all patients prior to transplant. While initially our antibiotic policy was independent of any surveillance culture, over recent years stool surveillance culture sensitivity has guided our choice of first line antibiotics in the post transplant FN. This retrospective analysis is aimed at comparing the outcomes of empirical versus surveillance stool culture guided selection of antibiotics in the immediate post allo-SCT FN. METHODOLOGY This was a retrospective analysis of 190 allo SCT patients from January 2008 to December 2014 at our centre. During the post transplant FN, patients were categorized into two groups. Group-1 (Empirical: n=48) received first line broad spectrum antibiotics as per our hospital policy i.e. cefoperazone + sulbactum combination with amikacin. Group-2 (Surveillance based: n=119) received first line antibiotics based on sensitivity pattern of stool surveillance culture. In both groups, escalation to second line antibiotics (carbapenems with or without colistin or tigecycline) was done if defervescence did not occur in 24-48 hours or blood cultures grew a resistant organism or if there was any clinical deterioration. The primary endpoint was defervescence rate after first line antibiotics in both groups. Secondary endpoints were need for second line antibiotics, duration of total antibiotic use, concordance between blood and surveillance stool culture, incidence and causes of mortality, prevalence of MDR organisms in stool surveillance culture and change in trend of resistant organisms in stool surveillance cultures over last 7 years. RESULTS One ninety patients underwent allo-SCT from January 2008 to December 2014.The median age of the cohort was 26 years (range 3-57 years) with 136 males and 54 females. The diagnoses were AML-75, ALL-46, CML-19, aplastic anemia-18, MDS-12 and others-20. Group 1 (Empirical) had 48 patients, while 119 were in Group 2 (Surveillance based). Twenty three patients did not have any growth in stool surveillance. In group 1, defervescence to first line antibiotics occurred in 23 (48 %) patients, whereas in group 2, it occurred in 78 (66 %) patients (P= 0.05). Defervescence within 24 hours was seen in 18 (37.5 %) patients in group 1 and 67 (56.3 %) patients in group 2 (P= 0.0425). In group 2, 34.5 % patients required escalation to second line antibiotics, compared to 54 % patients in group 1 (P = 0.0294). The median duration of total antibiotic use was 17.5 days in group 1 and 18 days in group 2 (P= NS). The concordance between blood culture and surveillance stool culture was seen in 3 (1.76 %) patients. There was no significant difference in infection related mortality between the two groups as shown in the figure 1. The prevalence of resistant organisms in the baseline surveillance stool culture changed between the periods 2008-2011 and 2012-2014. The incidence of extended spectrum beta lactamase (ESBL) organisms decreased from 79.66 % in 2008-2011 to 62.1 % in 2012-2014 (P = 0.0351). The incidence of carbapenem resistant (15.25 % vs. 25.26 %), colistin resistant (1.69 % vs. 2.1 %) and vancomycin resistant enterococcus (VRE: 3.38 % vs. 10.52 %) increased from 2008-2011 to 2012-2014 period. The increase in the combined incidence of carbapenem resistant, colistin resistant and VRE was from 20.32 % to 37.86 % (P = 0.0351). CONCLUSION Stool surveillance guided antibiotic usage leads to earlier defervescence in higher number of patients, while also reducing the need for second line antibiotics in patients undergoing allo-SCT. A randomized study is required to prove the importance of stool surveillance in this setting. Disclosures No relevant conflicts of interest to declare.

Antibiotic lock therapy for salvage of tunneled central venous catheters with catheter colonization and catheter‐related bloodstream infection

“…In our study as well, the proportion of CRBSI due to GNB was higher (83%) compared to majority of the previously published literature . Such high rates of GNB in our study could be related to the translocation of GNB from the gastrointestinal tract due to mucosal injury associated with the transplant conditioning regimens …”

Untitled

“…In our study it was observed that 28(93.3%) patients recovered from febrile neutropenia in both case and control group and the different was not statistically significant (p>0.05) between two groups. Paul, et al [1] also found in his study there was no significant different in infection related mortality between two groups.…”

“…The difference was not statistically significant (p>0.05) between two groups. Paul, et al [1] observed in their study in median age was 26 years (range 3-57) years. In this study majority patients 56.7% were male in cases (surveillance based) and 50% in control group (Empirical)…”

“…difference was not statistically significant (p>0.05) between two groups. Paul, et al [1] showed that 71.57% were male and 28.42% were female. In this study it was observed that majority patients 60% were suffering from AML in cases (surveillance based) and 80% in control (Empirical) group.…”

“…Duration of antibiotic used was significantly longer (p=0.011) in control group then case group. Paul, et al[1] found in his study the medium…”