Impact of Surgical Wait Time to Hysterectomy for Benign Gynecologic Disease

Abstract

To determine the impact of surgical wait time on healthcare use and surgical outcomes for patients undergoing hysterectomy for benign gynecologic indications. Design: Retrospective cohort study. Setting: Urban, academic tertiary care center. Patients: Patients who underwent hysterectomy for benign disease between 2012 and 2018. Interventions: None. Measurements and Main Results: Patients were categorized into 2 groups, dichotomized by surgical wait times >30 days or ≤30 days. Healthcare use was measured by the number of discrete patient interactions with the healthcare system through phone calls, secure electronic messaging, and office and emergency room visits. Univariate and multivariable logistic regression models were performed to assess the association between surgical wait time and healthcare use and perioperative outcomes while controlling for confounders. A total of 277 patients were included in our analysis: 106 (38.3%) had surgical wait times >30 days (median 47 days, range 24−68 days), and 171 (67.1%) had surgical wait times ≤30 days (median 19 days; range 12−26 days). The groups did not differ by age, insurance status, substance use, or comorbid conditions. Patients in the group with surgical wait times >30 days were more likely to have increased healthcare use (69 of 106, 65% vs 43 of 171, 25%; odds ratio 5.55; 95% confidence interval, 3.27−9.41). There were no differences in intraoperative complications (9 of 106, 8% vs 19 of 171, 11%; p = .482) or postoperative complications (28 of 106, 26% vs 32 of 171, 19%; p = .13) between the groups; however, after controlling for potential confounders, patients with surgical wait times >30 days were 3.22 times more likely to be readmitted than patients with surgical wait times ≤30 days (95% confidence interval, 1.27−8.19). Conclusion: A surgical wait time >30 days in patients undergoing a hysterectomy for benign disease is associated with increased healthcare use in the interim. Although patients who experience longer surgical wait times do not experience worse surgical outcomes, they may be at higher risk for readmission after surgery. Targeted interventions to optimize perioperative coordination of care for patients undergoing a hysterectomy for benign disease, especially those within vulnerable populations, are needed to improve quality of care, decrease any redundant or inefficient healthcare use, and reduce any unnecessary delays.

“It affects every aspect of your life”: A qualitative study of the impact of delaying surgery during COVID-19

“…(20, 21) Delaying surgeries considered less urgent, is associated with an increase cost to patients (e.g., increased pain, decreased quality of life) and the healthcare system. (22-26) Our study confirmed that perceived physical health was compromised due to the delays in surgery; however, the physical impact was less prominent and perhaps the driver of more significant effects on participants’ mental health and quality of life.…”

The impact of delaying surgery during the COVID-19 pandemic in Alberta: a qualitative study

“…21,22 Delaying surgeries considered less urgent is associated with an increased cost to patients (e.g., increased pain, decreased quality of life) and the health care system. [23][24][25][26][27] Our study confirmed that perceived physical health was compromised by the delays in surgery; however, the physical impact was less prominent and perhaps the driver of more significant effects on participants' mental health and quality of life.…”

Patient waiting time analysis for elective gynecologic surgeries in a tertiary training hospital in the Philippines: A retrospective cross-sectional study

“…Establishment of maximum waiting time targets is a promising strategy to avoid morbidities and surgical complications. In a retrospective cohort study conducted by Traylor et al among 277 patients who underwent hysterectomy for benign gynecologic disease from 2012 to 2018, patients with a surgical waitlist time of more than 30 days were 3.22 times more likely to be readmitted [ 7 ]. Likewise, they were shown to have an increased frequency of healthcare use and decreased quality of life.…”