1998
DOI: 10.1007/978-1-4612-0695-8_5
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Impact of Submerged Macrophytes on Fish-Zooplankton Interactions in Lakes

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
4
1

Citation Types

13
188
1
10

Year Published

2002
2002
2020
2020

Publication Types

Select...
5
3
1

Relationship

0
9

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 211 publications
(212 citation statements)
references
References 73 publications
13
188
1
10
Order By: Relevance
“…They did not prefer the SUB zone at any of the sampling times, although structural complexity among submersed macrophytes is o h an efficient refuge against predators (Schriver et al 1995, Jeppesen et al 1998). The SUB was not a very attnlctive Table 1.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 96%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…They did not prefer the SUB zone at any of the sampling times, although structural complexity among submersed macrophytes is o h an efficient refuge against predators (Schriver et al 1995, Jeppesen et al 1998). The SUB was not a very attnlctive Table 1.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 96%
“…Thus, an alternative predator avoidance strategy of die1 horizontal migration (DHM) is commonly observed in shallow lakes, where prey migrate into the vegetated littoral zone during the day ( Burks et al 2002). The structural complexity of the vegetation can act as a favorable refuge by reducing the feeding rate of predatory fish (Diehl 1988, Jeppesen et al 1998.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Complex relations between planktonic organisms and between planktonic organisms and macrophytes are a subject matter and a basis for making hypothesis and theories for different scientists (Scheffer et al, 1993(Scheffer et al, , 1992Jeppesen et al, 1998).…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Recent restoration measures, where external phosphorus (P) input and water turbidity were experimentally reduced, have led to the return of dense charophyte beds (Van den Berg et al, 1998a;Meijer et al, 1999;Ibelings et al, 2007). These restoration measures, however, were performed in sandy lakes, whereas peaty lakes are suffering from high internal loading of P from the sediment and are more prone to sediment resuspension (Cooke et al, 1993;Jeppesen et al, 1998;Søndergaard et al, 2003). Under natural conditions, peaty lakes in the Netherlands would not suffer from internal P loading, as upwelling iron rich groundwater binds to phosphorus (in the form of phosphate, PO 4 ) in the sediment.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%