2008 15th IEEE International Conference on Image Processing 2008
DOI: 10.1109/icip.2008.4711767
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Impact of subjective dataset on the performance of image quality metrics

Abstract: The interest in objective quality assessment have significantly increased over the past decades. Several objective quality metrics have been proposed and made publicly available, moreover, several subjective quality assessment databases are distributed in order to evaluate and compare the metrics. However, several question arises: are the objective metrics behaviours constant across databases, contents and distortions? how significantly the subjective scores might fluctuate on different displays (i.e. CRT or L… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
1
1

Citation Types

1
24
0

Year Published

2010
2010
2020
2020

Publication Types

Select...
4
4
1

Relationship

0
9

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 45 publications
(25 citation statements)
references
References 5 publications
(3 reference statements)
1
24
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Below: residuals for the linear approximation and norm of residuals. Table 5 Correlation coefficient versus MOS, IRCCyN/IVC image database [24] PSNR RR [4] Proposed RR MSSIM C4 [13,29] [4]. Above: scatter plot between mean opinion score and metric in [4].…”
Section: Simulation Set-up and Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Below: residuals for the linear approximation and norm of residuals. Table 5 Correlation coefficient versus MOS, IRCCyN/IVC image database [24] PSNR RR [4] Proposed RR MSSIM C4 [13,29] [4]. Above: scatter plot between mean opinion score and metric in [4].…”
Section: Simulation Set-up and Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Since almost all common databases contain a significant proportion of images taken from the Kodak Lossless True Color Image Suite, it is reasonable to suggest that these pictures have borne a significant influence on the IQA field. Conversely, it is both intuitive and supported by empirical evidence to suggest that reliable results may be obtained by using image databases that are large and diverse [25].…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 98%
“…It is noted in [38] that the performance of many image quality metrics could be quite different across databases. The difference in performance can be attributed to the differences in quality range, distortions, and contents across databases.…”
Section: Figurementioning
confidence: 99%