2019
DOI: 10.1093/ajcp/aqy166
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Impact of Specimen Type and Specimen Number on HER2 Status in Gastroesophageal Junction and Gastric Adenocarcinoma

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
9
0

Year Published

2020
2020
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
7

Relationship

0
7

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 9 publications
(9 citation statements)
references
References 32 publications
0
9
0
Order By: Relevance
“…43 Repeat HER2 testing has also been shown to increase the rate of HER2 positivity in gastric cancer. 44 Current Criteria (Approved or Proposed) for HER2 Positivity by Immunohistochemistry (IHC) and Fluorescence In Situ Hybridization (FISH) in Different Tumor Types Breast (ASCO/CAP 2018) 23 Gastric (ASCO/CAP 2016) 36 Colorectal (HERACLES Trial) 39 Endometrial Serous (Fader et Huber et al 44 assessed the impact of specimen type on HER2 status in gastric and gastroesophageal junction adenocarcinomas, and they reported that in patients with only 1 specimen 10.5% of tumors were HER2 þ , whereas the rate increased to 18.1% and 24.1% in patients with 2 or 3 specimens tested, respectively. Discordant HER2 status has also been observed between paired primary and metastatic tumors in close to 20% of breast, gastric, and most recently endometrial carcinomas.…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…43 Repeat HER2 testing has also been shown to increase the rate of HER2 positivity in gastric cancer. 44 Current Criteria (Approved or Proposed) for HER2 Positivity by Immunohistochemistry (IHC) and Fluorescence In Situ Hybridization (FISH) in Different Tumor Types Breast (ASCO/CAP 2018) 23 Gastric (ASCO/CAP 2016) 36 Colorectal (HERACLES Trial) 39 Endometrial Serous (Fader et Huber et al 44 assessed the impact of specimen type on HER2 status in gastric and gastroesophageal junction adenocarcinomas, and they reported that in patients with only 1 specimen 10.5% of tumors were HER2 þ , whereas the rate increased to 18.1% and 24.1% in patients with 2 or 3 specimens tested, respectively. Discordant HER2 status has also been observed between paired primary and metastatic tumors in close to 20% of breast, gastric, and most recently endometrial carcinomas.…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Discordant HER2 status has also been observed between paired primary and metastatic tumors in close to 20% of breast, gastric, and most recently endometrial carcinomas. [44][45][46] Furthermore, the optimal HER2 testing algorithm also depends on the correlation between the test type (IHC or FISH) and therapeutic response, although specific data for endometrial carcinoma are currently limited in the literature. In breast cancer, FISH and IHC are equally predictive of clinical response; hence, the current ASCO/CAP guidelines allow for either test to be performed primarily and recommend reflexing to the other method in cases with an equivocal result.…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Discordant HER2 status between primary and metastatic tumours has been demonstrated in breast, gastric and endometrial cancers. [31][32][33] The most common scenario is HER2-positive primary tumours with discordant HER2-negative metastases, and a reverse pattern can rarely occur. The major cause of such discordance is intratumoral heterogeneity, which is considerably higher in gastric cancer and endometrial serous carcinoma than in breast cancer.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…According to current literature, the frequency of HER2 overexpression/amplification in EA and GC tends to be different, ranging from 7% to 42% [64][65][66][67]. A slight greater HER2 positivity incidence has been reported in EA (24%-35%), more frequently in the subgroup of intestinal-type, in comparison to GC (9.5%-21%) [68][69][70].…”
Section: Her2 In Gastro-oesophageal Malignant Lesionsmentioning
confidence: 98%
“…About HER2 protein regulation, specific miRNAs, such as miR-125a-5p, miR-125b, miR-205, miR-331-3p and miR-146a have been proposed to straightly affect HER2 expression [61][62][63][64]. In addition, HER2 transcript suppression may represent the result of miR-125a-5p and/or miR-125b expressed in HER2-positive breast cancer cell lines infected with retroviral constructs [61][62][63].…”
Section: High-grade Dysplasia (Hgd)mentioning
confidence: 99%