2023
DOI: 10.1136/ip-2023-044944
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Impact of Sources of Strength on adolescent suicide deaths across three randomized trials

Abstract: Universal interventions are key to reducing youth suicide rates, yet no universal intervention has demonstrated reduction in suicide mortality through an RCT. This study pooled three cluster-RCTs ofSources of Strength(n=78 high schools), a universal social network-informed intervention. In each trial, matched pairs of schools were assigned to immediate intervention or wait-list. Six schools were assigned without a pair due to logistical constraints. During the study period, no suicides occurred in intervention… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1

Citation Types

1
0
0

Year Published

2024
2024
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
1

Relationship

0
1

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 1 publication
(1 citation statement)
references
References 16 publications
1
0
0
Order By: Relevance
“…5,6 This policy likely pre-equalized many of our patients on telehealth capacity, and thus unexpectedly prevented a future treatment disparity for youth with acute psychiatric symptoms. This finding is consistent with a growing literature on the benefit of universal school programs (e.g.,universal free lunch, 7 school-wide network approaches for suicide prevention 8,9 ) for youth mental health, and is consistent with the suprising benefit of such programs for reducing group-specific disparities. 10…”
Section: Discussionsupporting
confidence: 54%
“…5,6 This policy likely pre-equalized many of our patients on telehealth capacity, and thus unexpectedly prevented a future treatment disparity for youth with acute psychiatric symptoms. This finding is consistent with a growing literature on the benefit of universal school programs (e.g.,universal free lunch, 7 school-wide network approaches for suicide prevention 8,9 ) for youth mental health, and is consistent with the suprising benefit of such programs for reducing group-specific disparities. 10…”
Section: Discussionsupporting
confidence: 54%