Impact of Socioeconomic Status on Breast Reconstruction Outcomes

Abstract

BackgroundMinority patients and those from low socioeconomic backgrounds are faced with barriers to care regarding breast reconstruction. With this study, we seek to elucidate variances in demographics to determine predictors of complications in implant-based breast reconstruction.MethodsPatients who underwent breast reconstruction with either direct to implant or immediate expander reconstruction by 1 surgeon were identified using the preoperative Breast-Q.Current income statistics available from the US Census Bureau by self-reported zip code were used to determine the median household income (MHI) to stratify differing socioeconomic backgrounds. Demographics were compared with body mass index, comorbidities, overall rate of postoperative complications, rate of implant infection, and type of reconstruction.ResultsTwo hundred ninety-five patients met inclusion criteria. Overall rate of complications and rate of breast implant infection was higher for MHI of less than $50,000 compared with greater than $50,000 (P = 0.043 overall complications 40.20% vs 28.8%) (P = 0.04 implant infection 14.4% vs 7.1%). African American patients had higher body mass index (P = <0.001), rates of HTN (P = <0.001), and diabetes (P = 0.001), and were more likely to have a lower income (P = <0.001). There was, however, no difference in overall complications (P = 0.26), implant infection rate (P = 0.994), or capsular contracture (0.367) based on race. There was no difference in rate of comorbidities between low and high socioeconomic areas.ConclusionThis cohort demonstrates a higher rate of overall complications and infection in patients with a lower MHI and no difference based on race despite having higher risk factors for complications.Socioeconomic status is a multifaceted barrier to care that must be addressed in the perioperative period to decrease breast implant associated complications.

The value of microvascular breast reconstruction: Cost equivalence of TRAM and DIEP flaps implications in the era of CMS reforms

“…Furthermore, lower income quartiles were significantly associated with patients getting non-DIEP flaps. This finding reflects the current literature surrounding breast reconstruction and socioeconomic factors, that income affects the type of care patients are able to access and ultimately receive (Clegg et al, 2023;Dinis et al, 2021;Martin et al, 2022;Soto et al, 2023).…”

The Effect of Early Cultures and Dual-port Expanders on Two-stage, Prepectoral Breast Reconstruction: The 25/25 Study

“…There is the literature supporting increased complications in safety-net hospitals and rural communities attributable to more advanced disease, patient comorbidities, lack of fellowship-trained breast surgeons, and decreased resources. [28][29][30] The authors noted an unacceptably high 32.0% failure rate and sought change.…”

Impact of Sociodemographic and Hospital Factors on Inpatient Bilateral Reduction Mammaplasty: A National Inpatient Sample Analysis

“…The influence of race on clinical outcomes in plastic surgery remains contested within subjects like breast reconstruction and cleft palate repair. 10,11,28,29 Massey et al described a predictive effect of racial minority status on symptom severity of macromastia in adolescent women. 30 This indicates that race may not directly predict postoperative complications but may instead be mediated by a more complex relationship with symptom severity before surgery.…”