Impact of Social Vulnerability on COVID-19 Incidence and Outcomes in the United States

Abstract

Importance Prior pandemics have disparately affected socially vulnerable communities. Whether regional variations in social vulnerability to disasters influence COVID-19 outcomes and incidence in the U.S. is unknown. Objective To examine the association of Social Vulnerability Index (SVI), a percentile-based measure of county-level social vulnerability to disasters, and its sub-components (socioeconomic status, household composition, minority status, and housing type/transportation accessibility) with the case fatality rate (CFR) and incidence of COVID-19. Design Ecological study of counties with at least 50 confirmed COVID-19 cases as of April 4th, 2020. Generalized linear mixed-effects models with state-level clustering were applied to estimate county-level associations of overall SVI and its sub-component scores with COVID-19 CFR (deaths/100 cases) and incidence (cases/1000 population), adjusting for population percentage aged >65 years, and for comorbidities using the average Hierarchical Condition Category (HCC) score. Counties with high SVI (≥median) and high CFR (≥median) were identified. Setting Population-based study of U.S. county-level data. Participants U.S. counties with at least 50 confirmed COVID-19 cases. Main outcomes and measures COVID-19 CFR and incidence. Results Data from 433 counties including 283,256 cases and 6,644 deaths were analyzed. Median SVI was 0.46 [Range: 0.01-1.00], and median CFR and incidence were 1.9% [Range: 0-13.3] and 1.2 per 1000 people [Range: 0.6-38.8], respectively. Higher SVI, indicative of greater social vulnerability, was associated with higher CFR (RR: 1.19 [1.05, 1.34], p=0.005, per-1 unit increase), an association that strengthened after adjustment for age>65 years and comorbidities (RR: 1.63 [1.38, 1.91], p<0.001), and was further confirmed in a sensitivity analysis limited to six states with the highest testing levels. Although the association between overall SVI and COVID-19 incidence was not significant, the SVI sub-components of socioeconomic status and minority status were both predictors of higher incidence and CFR. A combination of high SVI (≥0.46) and high adjusted CFR (≥2.3%) was observed in 28.9% of counties. Conclusions and Relevance Social vulnerability is associated with higher COVID-19 case fatality. High social vulnerability and CFR coexist in more than 1 in 4 U.S. counties. These counties should be targeted by public policy interventions to help alleviate the pandemic burden on the most vulnerable population.

COVID-19 incidence and mortality in the Metropolitan Region, Chile: time, space, and structural factors

“…outcomes is an interesting result; the indicator shows to be relevant to explain infections and deaths, doing a good job capturing the complex nature of the problem, highlighting the role played by structural determinants-particularly with poverty and vulnerabilityand showing similar outcomes to other studies (87)(88)(89)(90)This result has more relevance considering that COVID-19 also has an impact on socioeconomic factors, generating a vicious circle between both problems (91)(92)(93). Third, the results identify different types of variables that explain the COVID-19 outcomes: demographic, health-related, and socioeconomic.…”

Assessing COVID-19 risk, vulnerability and infection prevalence in communities

“…While there are numerous indices with different applications, none, by themselves, can provide a comprehensive description of the influential factors in the COVID-19 pandemic. Among the existing indices, the Social Vulnerability Index (SVI) developed by the Geospatial Research, Analysis, and Services Program (GRASP) at the Centers for Disease Control and Prevention (CDC) and Agency for Toxic Substances and Disease Registry [ 30 ] is the most commonly used one and has been used to explain the variability in COVID-19 spread [ 6 ]. While SVI considers socioeconomic status, household composition/disability, minority status/language, and housing/transportation, it does not take environmental exposure, underlying medical conditions, behavioral, and lifestyle factors, and vulnerability to natural hazards into account.…”

Psychiatric Genomics Research During the COVID-19 Pandemic: A Survey of Psychiatric Genomics Consortium Researchers

“…Likewise, although we did not assess ancestry, it has been widely documented in the United States that individuals from underrepresented minority groups have been disproportionately affected by COVID-19 (Moore et al, 2020), which means that not only might more minority researchers be directly affected by COVID-19, but they are also more likely to have connections in socially vulnerable communities and have family members and members of their communities impacted (Nayak et al, 2020). This can divert both time and emotional energy away from career progress and further perpetuate existing systemic inequities in academe (Davis & Fry, 2019).…”