2022
DOI: 10.1002/cl2.1240
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Impact of social protection on gender equality in low‐ and middle‐income countries: A systematic review of reviews

Abstract: Background More than half of the global population is not effectively covered by any type of social protection benefit and women's coverage lags behind. Most girls and boys living in low‐resource settings have no effective social protection coverage. Interest in these essential programmes in low and middle‐income settings is rising and in the context of the COVID‐19 pandemic the value of social protection for all has been undoubtedly confirmed. However, evidence on whether the impact of different social protec… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
2

Citation Types

0
12
0

Year Published

2023
2023
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
5
2
1

Relationship

0
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 23 publications
(15 citation statements)
references
References 111 publications
0
12
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Overviews synthesise findings from reviews that are themselves synthesised products. Consequently, specific design and implementation features of primary studies are difficult to identify if these are not explicitly addressed by authors of the reviews (Perera et al., 2022). Similarly, the quality of primary studies is almost impossible to ascertain if reviews do not critically evaluate these.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…Overviews synthesise findings from reviews that are themselves synthesised products. Consequently, specific design and implementation features of primary studies are difficult to identify if these are not explicitly addressed by authors of the reviews (Perera et al., 2022). Similarly, the quality of primary studies is almost impossible to ascertain if reviews do not critically evaluate these.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…As subject‐based curriculum approaches are considered the status quo, primary studies usually set out to investigate the effects of more integrated approaches. Given that studies finding significant effects, in particular positive effects of interventions, may be more likely to be published than those without significant effects or negative ones (also see Perera et al., 2022), this would have been a crucial aspect to investigate. Moreover, discussions of risk of bias other than publication bias were lacking.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…This increased inclusion could be driven by a combination of legal and policy considerations, which explicitly target these individuals as eligible beneficiaries, and a lack of alternative support systems for this demographic, making social protection programs a critical source of assistance [44]. Additionally, gender disparities and the societal recognition of their vulnerabilities may further contribute to their prioritization in such programs [45]. These insights highlight the complex interplay of individual characteristics, socioeconomic factors, and program design, emphasizing the need for tailored policies that address the unique needs and circumstances of persons with disabilities [26, 46].…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Social protection is defined as policies and programs that help individuals and societies manage risk and uncertainty, protect them from poverty and inequality, and allow them to access economic opportunity [10]. They reduce poverty, inequality, and the prevalence of ill health; foster gender equality; and stimulate economic growth [11, 12, 13, 14]. Social protection programs that cater to the poorest populations can alleviate inequality [15].…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%