2011
DOI: 10.1007/s11129-011-9105-4
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Impact of social network structure on content propagation: A study using YouTube data

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1

Citation Types

3
111
1
1

Year Published

2013
2013
2018
2018

Publication Types

Select...
5
5

Relationship

0
10

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 173 publications
(119 citation statements)
references
References 36 publications
3
111
1
1
Order By: Relevance
“…However, likeability should preferably result from the fact that consumers see the influencer as a valuable source of information -an opinion leader -rather than merely from popularity. As number of followers indicates audience size and influencers disseminate their ideas among them, having more followers accelerates the diffusion of information (Yoganarasimhan, 2012). A high number of followers could thus be advantageous to the exertion of opinion leadership as ideas are spread more widely and rapidly and consequently, interpersonal influence is enhanced (Cha, Haddadi, Benevenuto, and Gummadi 2010).…”
Section: Theoretical Background and Hypotheses Development The Impactmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…However, likeability should preferably result from the fact that consumers see the influencer as a valuable source of information -an opinion leader -rather than merely from popularity. As number of followers indicates audience size and influencers disseminate their ideas among them, having more followers accelerates the diffusion of information (Yoganarasimhan, 2012). A high number of followers could thus be advantageous to the exertion of opinion leadership as ideas are spread more widely and rapidly and consequently, interpersonal influence is enhanced (Cha, Haddadi, Benevenuto, and Gummadi 2010).…”
Section: Theoretical Background and Hypotheses Development The Impactmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…As described by Yoganarasimhan (2012) in her study of the effect of bloggers' social relationships on the propagation of YouTube.com videos, one way of conceptualizing the virality of videos is the extent to which they are shared across social networks. Unlike in that paper, this paper does not have data on the underlying social relationships between the 10 Ealier versions of the paper also checked that the result was not an artifact of the fact that total views includes views of derivatives of the original ad.…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Ghose and Han (2009) state that little is known about how content creation is related to content usage or social network characteristics. Goldenberg et al (2009), Katona et al (2011), andYoganarasimhan (2011) document that network structure matters in the di¤usion of content. Narayan and Yang (2007) model the tendency to form ties, but do not consider the role of content.…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%