2017
DOI: 10.1007/s00380-017-1052-x
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Impact of simple electrocardiographic markers as predictors for deterioration of left ventricular function in patients with frequent right ventricular apical pacing

Abstract: Several trials demonstrated that frequent right ventricular apical pacing (RVAP) was associated with cardiac dysfunction and an increased rate of heart failure hospitalization. However, there are few reports about the 12-lead electrocardiogram (12-ECG) parameters at the time of device implantation to predict deterioration of LVEF in patients with frequent RVAP. We retrospectively studied 115 consecutive patients undergoing pacemaker or implantable cardioverter-defibrillator implantation with RVAP, with rate of… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
2
1

Citation Types

0
5
0
1

Year Published

2018
2018
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
6

Relationship

0
6

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 6 publications
(6 citation statements)
references
References 16 publications
0
5
0
1
Order By: Relevance
“…Despite certain heterogeneity, a few variables were identified as predictors in more than one cohort, increasing reliability that these variables are true risk predictors - such is the case of RV pacing burden, discussed earlier. Among evaluated cohorts, RV pacing burden is listed a predictor in five of them ( Table 1 ) [ 6 , 13 , 14 , 19 , 50 ] . Importantly, all five studies are observational, the majority of which is retrospective.…”
Section: Predictors Of Picmmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Despite certain heterogeneity, a few variables were identified as predictors in more than one cohort, increasing reliability that these variables are true risk predictors - such is the case of RV pacing burden, discussed earlier. Among evaluated cohorts, RV pacing burden is listed a predictor in five of them ( Table 1 ) [ 6 , 13 , 14 , 19 , 50 ] . Importantly, all five studies are observational, the majority of which is retrospective.…”
Section: Predictors Of Picmmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…If the 12-lead electrocardiography results after pacemaker implantation revealed QS pattern in all precordial leads, we excluded the patients because the ventricular lead was located in the RV apex. 15) The estimated RV lead position was classified into 3 zones by In LAO view, the distal tip of the ventricular lead directed posteriorly indicates the septal position. 14) Additional RAO view was adopted to avoid placing the lead in the right ventricular apex, coronary sinus ostium, or the groove between the septum and anterior free wall.…”
Section: Study Populationmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…We excluded patients with QS pattern in all precordial leads because the ventricular lead was estimated to be located in the right ventricular apex. 15) fluoroscopic images as reported previously: 16) 1) highseptum defined as one-third from the top of RV between the pulmonary artery bulge and the roof of the tricuspid valve, 2) mid-septum, and 3) low-septum defined as onethird from the bottom of RV.…”
Section: Study Populationmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…5 However, limited studies have elucidated the association between paced QRS morphology and PICM progression. 6,7 Since paced QRS morphology might be associated with ventricular dyssynchrony due to RV pacing, 8 specific paced QRS morphology could be related to PICM.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%