2016
DOI: 10.5194/acp-16-6757-2016
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Impact of Siberian forest fires on the atmosphere over the Korean Peninsula during summer 2014

Abstract: Abstract. Extensive forest fires occurred during late July 2014 across the forested region of Siberia, Russia. Smoke plumes emitted from Siberian forest fires underwent long-range transport over Mongolia and northeast China to the Korean Peninsula, which is located ∼ 3000 km south of the Siberian forest. A notably high aerosol optical depth of ∼ 4 was observed at a wavelength of 500 nm near the source of the Siberian forest fires. Smoke plumes reached 3-5 km in height near the source and fell below 2 km over t… Show more

Help me understand this report
View preprint versions

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

3
38
0

Year Published

2017
2017
2022
2022

Publication Types

Select...
7

Relationship

1
6

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 43 publications
(41 citation statements)
references
References 53 publications
(74 reference statements)
3
38
0
Order By: Relevance
“…This episode contrasted with Park et al (2013a), in which the episodes caused by emissions from wildfires in China and local emissions consecutively occurred in February-April 2011, and with Jung et al (2016), in which the episodes caused by emissions from China and Siberian forest fire consecutively occurred in July 2014. Du et al (2011) identified three types of episodes for Shanghai in the summer of 2009: (1) secondary pollution with elevated secondary ions; (2) biomass burning-induced pollution with high K + ; and (3) complicated pollution that combined the previous two pollution types.…”
Section: Analysis Of Concentration Variations At Seoul In May 2003mentioning
confidence: 81%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…This episode contrasted with Park et al (2013a), in which the episodes caused by emissions from wildfires in China and local emissions consecutively occurred in February-April 2011, and with Jung et al (2016), in which the episodes caused by emissions from China and Siberian forest fire consecutively occurred in July 2014. Du et al (2011) identified three types of episodes for Shanghai in the summer of 2009: (1) secondary pollution with elevated secondary ions; (2) biomass burning-induced pollution with high K + ; and (3) complicated pollution that combined the previous two pollution types.…”
Section: Analysis Of Concentration Variations At Seoul In May 2003mentioning
confidence: 81%
“…In and Kim (2010) considered biomass burning and fugitive dust emissions from other areas such as China and Korea as well, to explain the variations of concentrations in May 2003. Recently, Jung et al (2016) demonstrated that the haze episode in late July 2014 was consecutively impacted by anthropogenic emissions from China and smoke plumes from Siberian forest fires using remote sensing data and chemical analyses.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…1). Because Daejeon is located downwind of Asian continental outflows, it is frequently affected by long-range transported pollutants and Asian dust (Jung et al, 2016). Light scattering and absorption coefficients were continuously measured inside a monitoring building (∼ 15 m above the ground) of the National Institute of Environmental Research in South Korea.…”
Section: General Description Of Measurementmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Online measurements of PM 2.5 organic carbon (OC) and elemental carbon (EC) were conducted using a semicontinuous carbon analyzer (Sunset Laboratory Inc., model RT3140) based on the thermal-optical transmittance (TOT) protocol for pyrolysis correction and the NIOSH (National Institute for Occupational Safety and Health) 5040 method temperature profile (Birch and Cary, 1996;Jung et al, 2010). Measurement condition of the carbon analyzer was described in detail by Jung et al (2016). The detection limit of both OC and EC was 0.5 µg C m −3 for 1 h time resolution, as reported by the manufacturer.…”
Section: General Description Of Measurementmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation