1996
DOI: 10.1001/archinte.1996.00440210121012
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Impact of Screening for Mental Health Concerns on Health Service Utilization and Functional Status in Primary Care Patients

Abstract: The 16-item first-stage Symptom-Driven Diagnostic System for Primary Care screening questionnaire for mental disorders can identify primary care patients who are at risk for lower functional status and higher utilization. Use of the Symptom-Driven Diagnostic System for Primary Care second-stage diagnostic modules in patients who screened positively for mental disorders was associated with lower utilization rates but had no impact on functional outcome or patient satisfaction after 3 months.

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1
1

Citation Types

1
8
0

Year Published

1999
1999
2014
2014

Publication Types

Select...
9

Relationship

0
9

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 35 publications
(9 citation statements)
references
References 22 publications
1
8
0
Order By: Relevance
“…To be classified as nonanxious, participants had to have an ASI and SPRAS score lower than 20 and no history of mental illness. We employed 20 as the cut-off score for nonanxious participants because the mean ASI score for nonclinical college age women is 19.8 [18], and the mean SPRAS score for primary care patients with one or more mental disorders (including generalized anxiety disorder and panic disorder) is 19.9 [20].…”
Section: Participantsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…To be classified as nonanxious, participants had to have an ASI and SPRAS score lower than 20 and no history of mental illness. We employed 20 as the cut-off score for nonanxious participants because the mean ASI score for nonclinical college age women is 19.8 [18], and the mean SPRAS score for primary care patients with one or more mental disorders (including generalized anxiety disorder and panic disorder) is 19.9 [20].…”
Section: Participantsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Over the past 20 years, a series of studies has been conducted to improve the recognition of depression by screening primary care patients for depressive symptoms ( Johnstone and Goldberg 1976;Moore, Silimper, and Bobula 1978;Zung, Magill, Moore et al 1983;Linn and Yager 1984;Hoeper, Kessler, Nyez, et al 1984;Shapiro, German, and Skinner 1987;Magruder-Habib, Zung, Feussner, et al 1989;and Feussner 1990;Ormel, Koeter, van den Brink, et al 1991;Coyne, Fechner-Bates, and Schwenk 1994;Dorwick and Buchan 1995;Greenfield, Meszler-Reizes, Magruder, et al 1997;Riefler, Kessler, Bernhard, et al 1996;Coyne, Klinkman, Gallo, et al 1998). Katon and Gonzales (1994) reviewed the evidence on randomized controlled trials of screening interventions published until 1993.…”
Section: Case Finding and Construction Of An "Epidemiologic Map"mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…[42][43][44] While tempting to speculate that systematic screening for the presence of an anxiety disorder could help overcome these barriers and improve clinical outcomes, reports from the depression literature suggest otherwise. 27,41,[45][46][47] Nevertheless, recognition of the anxiety disorder is a necessary first step. A variety of ''collaborative care'' strategies 48 for treating depressed primary care patients that include a case-finding component and systematic follow-up by a care manager who follows an evidence-based protocol in concert with patients' PCPs have been proven effective.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%