2015
DOI: 10.12693/aphyspola.127.a-59
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Impact of Scaling Range on the Effectiveness of Detrending Methods

Abstract: We make the comparative study of scaling range properties for detrended fluctuation analysis (DFA), detrended moving average analysis (DMA) and recently proposed new technique called modified detrended moving average analysis (MDMA). Basic properties of scaling ranges for these techniques are reviewed. The efficiency and exactness of all three methods towards proper determination of scaling Hurst exponent H is discussed, particularly for short series of uncorrelated and persistent data.

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
1
1

Citation Types

0
16
0

Year Published

2015
2015
2019
2019

Publication Types

Select...
6
1

Relationship

0
7

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 12 publications
(16 citation statements)
references
References 26 publications
0
16
0
Order By: Relevance
“…As a way to characterize nonstationary data with trend, the detrended fluctuation analysis (DFA) [9,10], and the detrending moving average (DMA) analysis [11][12][13][14] have been proposed to quantify long-range autocorrelations, multifractal features [15][16][17][18][19], cross-correlation [20,21] and higher dimensional fractals [22][23][24][25] either in the time or in the space domain. According to the DFA, the time series is first divided in boxes of equal lengths, then trends are estimated as least-squares polynomial fitting of different orders m in each non-overlapping and equally spaced box of length n. The DMA algorithm has been proposed as an alternative technique to quantify long-range correlations.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…As a way to characterize nonstationary data with trend, the detrended fluctuation analysis (DFA) [9,10], and the detrending moving average (DMA) analysis [11][12][13][14] have been proposed to quantify long-range autocorrelations, multifractal features [15][16][17][18][19], cross-correlation [20,21] and higher dimensional fractals [22][23][24][25] either in the time or in the space domain. According to the DFA, the time series is first divided in boxes of equal lengths, then trends are estimated as least-squares polynomial fitting of different orders m in each non-overlapping and equally spaced box of length n. The DMA algorithm has been proposed as an alternative technique to quantify long-range correlations.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The problem of choosing an appropriate length for scaling range has been examined in the papers. [49][50][51] The impact of scaling range on the e®ectiveness of some detranding methods (including DFA and DMA) has been investigated in the same works. The authors¯nd the actual scaling range for which the real value of correlation exponent is strictly reproduced.…”
Section: Self-similarity Analysismentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Even though the method is not directly connected to the power-law decay of auto-correlations nor to the scaling of variances of the partial sums nor the diverging power spectrum, it has been frequently applied mainly due to its computational efficiency. The connection between the estimator itself and the actual long-range dependence -that the variance of integrated series of the long-range dependent process follows a power-law with respect to the length of the moving window -has been shown numerically [48,34,49].…”
Section: Detrended Moving-average Cross-correlation Analysismentioning
confidence: 99%