2007
DOI: 10.1164/rccm.200602-244oc
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Impact of Salmeterol/Fluticasone Propionate versus Salmeterol on Exacerbations in Severe Chronic Obstructive Pulmonary Disease

Abstract: This study demonstrates that combination therapy with salmeterol/fluticasone compared with salmeterol monotherapy significantly reduces the frequency of moderate/severe exacerbations in patients with severe COPD.

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1
1

Citation Types

9
182
2
17

Year Published

2007
2007
2016
2016

Publication Types

Select...
7
2
1

Relationship

0
10

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 293 publications
(210 citation statements)
references
References 41 publications
9
182
2
17
Order By: Relevance
“…The risk was higher in patients with more severe COPD, in particular in patients with GOLD stage 4 and in patients with Medical Research Council (MRC) dyspnoea scores of 4e5 [33,34]. In the INSPIRE study, a similarly increased risk of exacerbations treated with antibiotics was observed in patients treated with a fluticasone/salmeterol combination compared to patients treated with tiotropium (7.6% vs 3.6%, respectively, p < 0.008) [35]; moreover, a one-year study comparingfluticasone/ salmeterol combination with fluticasone alone also showed similar results (4.5% vs 1.4% in FS and F respectively, p < 0.05) [36]. A more detailed analysis of the TORCH and INSPIRE studies revealed an excess risk of 3.6 pneumonia events per 100 patients and of 5.7 events per 100 patients, respectively, corresponding to a number needed to treat (NNT) of 28 and 18 patients, in patients treated with fluticasone.…”
Section: Potential Side Effects Of Ics In Copd: the Risk Of Pneumoniamentioning
confidence: 70%
“…The risk was higher in patients with more severe COPD, in particular in patients with GOLD stage 4 and in patients with Medical Research Council (MRC) dyspnoea scores of 4e5 [33,34]. In the INSPIRE study, a similarly increased risk of exacerbations treated with antibiotics was observed in patients treated with a fluticasone/salmeterol combination compared to patients treated with tiotropium (7.6% vs 3.6%, respectively, p < 0.008) [35]; moreover, a one-year study comparingfluticasone/ salmeterol combination with fluticasone alone also showed similar results (4.5% vs 1.4% in FS and F respectively, p < 0.05) [36]. A more detailed analysis of the TORCH and INSPIRE studies revealed an excess risk of 3.6 pneumonia events per 100 patients and of 5.7 events per 100 patients, respectively, corresponding to a number needed to treat (NNT) of 28 and 18 patients, in patients treated with fluticasone.…”
Section: Potential Side Effects Of Ics In Copd: the Risk Of Pneumoniamentioning
confidence: 70%
“…Some of these medications may increase the likelihood of infections: atypical antipsychotics may impair consciousness and increase the frequency of aspiration (Knol W & Al, 2008;Gau JT & Al, 2010); H2 blockers and protonic pump inhibitors (PPI) lead to decreased gastric acidity and may contribute to increased gastrointestinal infections (Laheij RI & Al;2004;Gulmez SE & Al, 2007;Eom CS & Al 2011;Laria A & Al, 2011). Oral and inhaled glucocorticoid therapy are associated with an increased dose-dependent risk of infections (Ernst P & Al, 2007;Calverley PM & Al, 2007;Kardos P & Al, 2007;Drummond MB & Al, 2008;Singh S & Al, 2009;Smitten AL, & Al 2008;Dixon WG & Al, 2011).…”
Section: Drugs Use In Elderly Nursing Homes Residentsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The MID for the SGRQ is well established 28 and studies do report differences in the proportion of patients achieving this. For example, a study of the effects of salmeterol/fluticasone versus salmeterol showed that the number of patients with a reduction in SGRQ of 4 points or more was significantly higher in the combination group (41.7% v 30%), 29 and in the UPLIFT study a higher proportion of patients in the tiotropium group than in the placebo group had an improvement of 4 units or more in the SGRQ total scores from baseline at 4 years (45% vs. 36%).…”
Section: How Are the Data Presented?mentioning
confidence: 99%