2021
DOI: 10.1016/j.diagmicrobio.2021.115388
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Impact of RNA degradation on influenza diagnosis in the surveillance system

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
5
0

Year Published

2022
2022
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
5
1

Relationship

1
5

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 7 publications
(7 citation statements)
references
References 18 publications
0
5
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Several drawbacks of using the RT‐PCR technique, including the questionable stability of RNA 39,40 and high detection timing of nucleic‐acid based methods, require to be compensated by methods which are rapid yet accurate, reliable and stable. Antibody‐antigen interactions have been used in clinical detection for a long time because of their high stability, unlike RNA 41 .…”
Section: Diagnostic Approachesmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Several drawbacks of using the RT‐PCR technique, including the questionable stability of RNA 39,40 and high detection timing of nucleic‐acid based methods, require to be compensated by methods which are rapid yet accurate, reliable and stable. Antibody‐antigen interactions have been used in clinical detection for a long time because of their high stability, unlike RNA 41 .…”
Section: Diagnostic Approachesmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Sample transportation and storage temperature was whole-process monitored by Testo 184 data logger. In CNIC, samples were preliminarily screened by real-time RT PCR using seasonal influenza detection primers and probes right after CNIC received the samples [18]. Positive samples were then selected for virus isolation.…”
Section: Sample Collection and Study Designmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Nucleic acid was detected as previously described [18]. Nucleic acid was extracted from 200 µl samples using MagMAX™ CORE Nucleic Acid Purification Kit on MagMAX_Core_Flex automatic machine.…”
Section: Nucleic Acid Detectionmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…In turn, these test results form the basis for decisions concerning their prevention and control. Regardless of sample status at the time of collection on the farm, RT-qPCR results reflect the quality and quantity of the target nucleic acid in the sample at the moment it is processed for testing in the laboratory [ 3 , 4 ]. However, between the time the sample is collected on the farm, packaged, shipped, and finally tested in the laboratory, it may have been exposed to handling conditions that adversely affect the RNA in the specimen and, therefore, the subsequent RT-qPCR test results.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%