2013
DOI: 10.1200/jco.2012.48.0467
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Impact of Rituximab and Radiotherapy on Outcome of Patients With Aggressive B-Cell Lymphoma and Skeletal Involvement

Abstract: Rituximab failed to improve the outcome of patients with diffuse large B-cell lymphoma with skeletal involvement, although our data suggest a beneficial effect of radiotherapy to sites of skeletal involvement. Whether radiotherapy to sites of skeletal involvement can be spared in cases with a negative positron emission tomography after immunochemotherapy should be addressed in appropriately designed prospective trials.

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1

Citation Types

3
74
1
5

Year Published

2014
2014
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
5
5

Relationship

1
9

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 95 publications
(83 citation statements)
references
References 33 publications
3
74
1
5
Order By: Relevance
“…This is not only due to the smaller number of patients treated with rituximab; rather, that rituximab quenches differences between prognostic subgroups by improving the outcome of poor-prognosis subgroups more than that of patients with low IPI appears to be responsible for this observation (Table 2). 27 Our results do not support the generalizing conclusion of a Spanish study, that rituximab works better in lymphatic than extralymphatic disease 28 ; rather, the results of this study and our recently published study of skeletal involvement 29 suggest that differences in rituximab efficacy between lymphatic and extralymphatic sites may exist for some (eg, skeletal involvement), but not for other (eg, craniofacial) extralymphatic sites of involvement.…”
Section: Discussioncontrasting
confidence: 56%
“…This is not only due to the smaller number of patients treated with rituximab; rather, that rituximab quenches differences between prognostic subgroups by improving the outcome of poor-prognosis subgroups more than that of patients with low IPI appears to be responsible for this observation (Table 2). 27 Our results do not support the generalizing conclusion of a Spanish study, that rituximab works better in lymphatic than extralymphatic disease 28 ; rather, the results of this study and our recently published study of skeletal involvement 29 suggest that differences in rituximab efficacy between lymphatic and extralymphatic sites may exist for some (eg, skeletal involvement), but not for other (eg, craniofacial) extralymphatic sites of involvement.…”
Section: Discussioncontrasting
confidence: 56%
“…[14] In a large study on DLBCL with skeletal involvement (which included 52 cases of PB-DLBCL), Held and coworkers also demonstrated a positive impact of radiotherapy on survival. [31] The question of RT as a therapeutic modality in PB-DLBCL -in combination with immunochemotherapy -may represents a pivotal question for future prospective clinical trials.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The staging procedures will include thoracic-abdominal-pelvic computed tomography (CT) scan, bone-marrow biopsy and cerebrospinal fluid cytology. The disease stage is determined using the Ann Arbor criteria of which divided into four stages (I-IV) and the majority having extra-nodal stage I or II (IE or IIE) disease [10]. Bulky disease is defined as a lesion exceeding >5 cm [11,12].…”
Section: Investigationsmentioning
confidence: 99%