2014
DOI: 10.1002/bjs.9461
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Impact of risk scoring on decision-making in symptomatic moderate carotid atherosclerosis

Abstract: The addition of a risk score appeared to influence clinicians in their decision-making towards CEA in high-risk patients and towards best medical therapy in low-risk patients.

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3

Citation Types

0
6
0
1

Year Published

2015
2015
2019
2019

Publication Types

Select...
6

Relationship

0
6

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 7 publications
(7 citation statements)
references
References 30 publications
0
6
0
1
Order By: Relevance
“…In addition, the inclusion of other vascular-specific risk factors correlated with poor outcomes in vascular patients, such as rest pain, diabetes, and previous amputation, may have utility in further increasing the diagnostic accuracy of the RAI. 9,[19][20][21][22][23][24][25][26][27][28]…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…In addition, the inclusion of other vascular-specific risk factors correlated with poor outcomes in vascular patients, such as rest pain, diabetes, and previous amputation, may have utility in further increasing the diagnostic accuracy of the RAI. 9,[19][20][21][22][23][24][25][26][27][28]…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…However, carotid disease provides a unique pathology with multiple treatment modalities (open surgical, endovascular, and medical) where frailty screening may actually shape management. 31 In particular, asymptomatic patients must have excellent outcomes and a reasonable life expectancy to justify a prophylactic operation. 32,33 …”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…However, carotid disease provides a unique pathology with multiple treatment modalities (open surgical, endovascular, and medical) where frailty screening may actually shape management. 31 In particular, asymptomatic patients must have excellent outcomes and a reasonable life expectancy to justify a prophylactic operation. 32,33 There are a number of limitations to this present study.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%