Impact of risk perception on customer purchase behavior: a meta-analysis

Abstract

Purpose Risk perception is an essential factor affecting how individuals evaluate risk, make decisions and behave. The impact of risk perception on customer purchase behavior has been widely studied; however, the association has been debated. Therefore, the purpose of this paper is to examine the relationship between risk perception and customer purchase behavior and to examine factors that could moderate it. Design/methodology/approach This study conducted a meta-analysis of this relationship and examined factors that could moderate it. Six databases were comprehensively searched. Two reviewers independently selected the studies for inclusion, extracted data and assessed quality. Pearson's r was used as the effect estimate. A total of 33 studies were included in the meta-analysis. Findings The results revealed a negative relationship between risk perception and customer purchase behavior. The geographical region, purchase channel and country development level affected the relationship. The correlation between perceived risk and purchase behavior in European consumers was the highest, followed by the correlation in American consumers; the weakest correlation was found in Asian consumers. For consumers in developed countries, perceived risk had a stronger negative influence on customer purchase behavior than that for consumers in developing countries. The perceived risk of online purchase channels had a stronger negative impact on customer purchase behavior than that of offline purchase channels. Research limitations/implications Risk perception is a useful context in which to explain barriers to customer purchase behavior. In addition, reducing consumers’ risk perception and perfecting the market transaction process with respect to buying behavior should be further studied. Originality/value The findings of this review indicate a direct negative relationship between risk perception and customer purchase behavior. To the best of the authors’ knowledge, this review is the first to meta-analytically summarize the impact of risk perception on customer purchase behavior in social sciences research, and it also illuminates new perspectives for future studies.

Effectiveness of acceptance and commitment therapy for mental illness in cancer patients: A systematic review and meta‐analysis of randomised controlled trials

“…Because almost all of the studies included in our analysis were of low or very low quality, and because of the high heterogeneity of studies in terms of anxiety, psychological flexibility, quality of life, and fear, our estimates of the effects in these areas are uncertain. As more studies emerge in the future, the long‐term effectiveness of ACT on these outcomes should be re‐examined via meta‐analysis, and an attempt should be made to explain the observed heterogeneity 57–64 …”

Do Health, Environmental and Ethical Concerns Affect Purchasing Behavior? A Meta-Analysis and Narrative Review

“…Risk of bias assessment was used to evaluate the quality of the 54 studies included in the meta-analysis. Six items adapted from previously developed risk of bias instruments (Li et al 2020;Viswanathan et al 2013) were employed in this study. For each item, the response options are no, yes and unclear (Table 1).…”

“…There is also a difference in purchasing behavior seen across levels of a country's economic development, as people have different economic abilities to buy a product (Li et al 2020). There have been studies examining the correlation between health, environmental and ethical concerns and purchase behavior in both high-income (Uzdavinyte et al 2019;Schill et al 2019) and low-and middle-income countries (Tong and Kang 2019;Malik et al 2019), with mixed findings.…”

Consumers’ purchase behaviour and green marketing: A synthesis, review and agenda

“…Li et al. (2020) also found that the perceived risk of online purchase channels had a stronger negative impact on customer purchase behaviour than that of offline purchase channels. Considering these correlations and perceived risks, specific psychological studies may be conducted in the context of channels used by customers while purchasing green products.…”

“…According to Perera and Hewege (2018), these perceived risks have restricted green purchases in many countries such as; Australia, Malaysia and Canada. The correlation between perceived risk and purchase behaviour has been found weakest in Asian countries and highest in European countries (Li et al., 2020). Li et al.…”