Abstract:BackgroundErlotinib is an epidermal growth factor receptor (EGFR)-targeting tyrosine kinase inhibitor approved for treatment of non-small cell lung cancer. The wide inter-individual pharmacokinetic (PK) variability of erlotinib may impact treatment outcome and/or toxicity. Recent in vivo studies reported a nonlinear uptake transport of erlotinib into the liver, suggesting carrier-mediated system(s) to mediate its hepatobiliary clearance. Erlotinib has been identified in vitro as a substrate of organic anion-tr… Show more
“…RIF (40 mg/kg intravenously, i.v.) was injected immediately before [ 99m Tc]mebrofenin as previously described [ 33 ]. The PK of subcutaneously (s.c.) injected DTZ (20 mg/kg) has been reported in rats with plasma concentration > 10 µg/mL (25 µM) obtained 60 min after injection [ 34 ], consistent with the potency of DTZ to inhibit MRP2, assessed in vitro in the present study.…”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The uptake clearance of [ 99m Tc]mebrofenin from blood to the liver (CL uptake ) was estimated using the integration plot method [ 33 , 35 ] from 0 to 3 min (linear part) after [ 99m Tc]mebrofenin injection using the following equation: . X liver,t represents the total amount of [ 99m Tc]mebrofenin in the liver at the time t, C blood,t represents the concentration of [ 99m Tc]mebrofenin in the blood at time t (derived from the heart ROI).…”
The multidrug resistance-associated protein 2 (MRP2) mediates the biliary excretion of drugs and metabolites. [99mTc]mebrofenin may be employed as a probe for hepatic MRP2 activity because its biliary excretion is predominantly mediated by this transporter. As the liver uptake of [99mTc]mebrofenin depends on organic anion-transporting polypeptide (OATP) activity, a safe protocol for targeted inhibition of hepatic MRP2 is needed to study the intrinsic role of each transporter system. Diltiazem (DTZ) and cyclosporin A (CsA) were first confirmed to be potent MRP2 inhibitors in vitro. Dynamic acquisitions were performed in rats (n = 5–6 per group) to assess the kinetics of [99mTc]mebrofenin in the liver, intestine and heart-blood pool after increasing doses of inhibitors. Their impact on hepatic blood flow was assessed using Doppler ultrasound (n = 4). DTZ (s.c., 10 mg/kg) and low-dose CsA (i.v., 0.01 mg/kg) selectively decreased the transfer of [99mTc]mebrofenin from the liver to the bile (k3). Higher doses of DTZ and CsA did not further decrease k3 but dose-dependently decreased the uptake (k1) and backflux (k2) rate constants between blood and liver. High dose of DTZ (i.v., 3 mg/kg) but not CsA (i.v., 5 mg/kg) significantly decreased the blood flow in the portal vein and hepatic artery. Targeted pharmacological inhibition of hepatic MRP2 activity can be achieved in vivo without impacting OATP activity and liver blood flow. Clinical studies are warranted to validate [99mTc]mebrofenin in combination with low-dose CsA as a novel substrate/inhibitor pair to untangle the role of OATP and MRP2 activity in liver diseases.
“…RIF (40 mg/kg intravenously, i.v.) was injected immediately before [ 99m Tc]mebrofenin as previously described [ 33 ]. The PK of subcutaneously (s.c.) injected DTZ (20 mg/kg) has been reported in rats with plasma concentration > 10 µg/mL (25 µM) obtained 60 min after injection [ 34 ], consistent with the potency of DTZ to inhibit MRP2, assessed in vitro in the present study.…”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The uptake clearance of [ 99m Tc]mebrofenin from blood to the liver (CL uptake ) was estimated using the integration plot method [ 33 , 35 ] from 0 to 3 min (linear part) after [ 99m Tc]mebrofenin injection using the following equation: . X liver,t represents the total amount of [ 99m Tc]mebrofenin in the liver at the time t, C blood,t represents the concentration of [ 99m Tc]mebrofenin in the blood at time t (derived from the heart ROI).…”
The multidrug resistance-associated protein 2 (MRP2) mediates the biliary excretion of drugs and metabolites. [99mTc]mebrofenin may be employed as a probe for hepatic MRP2 activity because its biliary excretion is predominantly mediated by this transporter. As the liver uptake of [99mTc]mebrofenin depends on organic anion-transporting polypeptide (OATP) activity, a safe protocol for targeted inhibition of hepatic MRP2 is needed to study the intrinsic role of each transporter system. Diltiazem (DTZ) and cyclosporin A (CsA) were first confirmed to be potent MRP2 inhibitors in vitro. Dynamic acquisitions were performed in rats (n = 5–6 per group) to assess the kinetics of [99mTc]mebrofenin in the liver, intestine and heart-blood pool after increasing doses of inhibitors. Their impact on hepatic blood flow was assessed using Doppler ultrasound (n = 4). DTZ (s.c., 10 mg/kg) and low-dose CsA (i.v., 0.01 mg/kg) selectively decreased the transfer of [99mTc]mebrofenin from the liver to the bile (k3). Higher doses of DTZ and CsA did not further decrease k3 but dose-dependently decreased the uptake (k1) and backflux (k2) rate constants between blood and liver. High dose of DTZ (i.v., 3 mg/kg) but not CsA (i.v., 5 mg/kg) significantly decreased the blood flow in the portal vein and hepatic artery. Targeted pharmacological inhibition of hepatic MRP2 activity can be achieved in vivo without impacting OATP activity and liver blood flow. Clinical studies are warranted to validate [99mTc]mebrofenin in combination with low-dose CsA as a novel substrate/inhibitor pair to untangle the role of OATP and MRP2 activity in liver diseases.
“…In mice and rats, rifampicin caused a pronounced reduction in the rate constant for the uptake of [ 11 C]erlotinib from the blood into the liver, while a similar, but markedly less pronounced decrease was observed in humans. These results indicated that rifampicin-inhibitable transporters, possibly OATP2B1 (SLCO2B1), contributed to the distribution of [ 11 C] erlotinib from the blood into the liver [97,98].…”
Section: Pet To Assess Transporter-mediated Ddismentioning
confidence: 97%
“…Several studies have addressed these questions by employing PET with radiolabeled drugs. Already marketed drugs, such as metformin, telmisartan, rosuvastatin, glyburide or erlotinib, have been studied with PET to assess their interactions with hepatocyte transporters and/or their vulnerability to transporter-mediated DDIs, in combination with prototypical transporter inhibitors [37,56,66,70,77,78,94,97,98]. This approach may potentially also find application in the study of new drug candidates to obtain crucial information on tissue distribution and transportermediated clearance, which may ultimately improve drug safety and efficacy.…”
Introduction: Membrane transporters of the SLC and ABC families are abundantly expressed in the liver, where they control the transfer of drugs/drug metabolites across the sinusoidal and canalicular hepatocyte membranes and play a pivotal role in hepatic drug clearance. Noninvasive imaging methods, such as PET, SPECT or MRI, allow for measuring the activity of hepatic transporters in vivo, provided that suitable transporter imaging probes are available. Areas covered: We give an overview of the working principles of imaging-based assessment of hepatic transporter activity. We discuss different currently available PET/SPECT radiotracers and MRI contrast agents and their applications to measure hepatic transporter activity in health and disease. We cover mathematical modeling approaches to obtain quantitative parameters of transporter activity and provide a critical assessment of methodological limitations and challenges associated with this approach. Expert opinion: PET in combination with pharmacokinetic modeling can be potentially applied in drug development to study the distribution of new drug candidates to the liver and their clearance mechanisms. This approach bears potential to mechanistically assess transporter-mediated drug-drug interactions, to assess the influence of disease on hepatic drug disposition and to validate and refine currently available in vitro-in vivo extrapolation methods to predict hepatic clearance of drugs.
ARTICLE HISTORY
“…Two control animals and two elacridar-treated animals were injected with 11 C-erlotinib. Arterial plasma sampling, sample preparation and analytical methods used for the determination of parent 11 C-erlotinib in plasma were performed as previously described [44]. Time activity curves (TACs) of unmetabolized parent 11 C-erlotinib in plasma were expressed as the percentage of injected dose per volume (%ID.mL −3 ) versus time.…”
Section: Impact Of Elacridar On 11 C-erlotinib Plasma Kineticsmentioning
Overcoming the efflux mediated by ATP-binding cassette (ABC) transporters at the blood-brain barrier (BBB) remains a challenge for the delivery of small molecule tyrosine kinase inhibitors (TKIs) such as erlotinib to the brain. Inhibition of ABCB1 and ABCG2 at the mouse BBB improved the BBB permeation of erlotinib but could not be achieved in humans. BBB disruption induced by focused ultrasound (FUS) was investigated as a strategy to overcome the efflux transport of erlotinib in vivo. In rats, FUS combined with microbubbles allowed for a large and spatially controlled disruption of the BBB in the left hemisphere. ABCB1/ABCG2 inhibition was performed using elacridar (10 mg/kg i.v). The brain kinetics of erlotinib was studied using 11 C-erlotinib Positron Emission Tomography (PET) imaging in 5 groups (n = 4-5 rats per group) including a baseline group, immediately after sonication (FUS), 48 h after FUS (FUS + 48 h), elacridar (ELA) and their combination (FUS + ELA). BBB integrity was assessed using the Evan's Blue (EB) extravasation test. Brain exposure to 11 C-erlotinib was measured as the area under the curve (AUC) of the brain kinetics (% injected dose (%ID) versus time (min)) in volumes corresponding to the disrupted (left) and the intact (right) hemispheres, respectively. EB extravasation highlighted BBB disruption in the left hemisphere of animals of the FUS and FUS + ELA groups but not in the control and ELA groups. EB extravasation was not observed 48 h after FUS suggesting recovery of BBB integrity. Compared with the control group (AUC Baseline = 1.4 ± 0.5%ID.min), physical BBB disruption did not impact the brain kinetics of 11 C-erlotinib in the left hemisphere (p > .05) either immediately (AUC FUS = 1.2 ± 0.1%ID.min) or 48 h after FUS (AUC FUS+48h = 1.1 ± 0.3%ID.min). Elacridar similarly increased 11 C-erlotinib brain exposure to the left hemisphere in the absence (AUC ELA = 2.2 ± 0.5%ID.min, p < .001) and in the presence of BBB disruption (AUC FUS+ELA = 2.1 ± 0.5%ID.min, p < .001). AUC left was never significantly different from AUC right (p > .05), in any of the tested conditions. BBB integrity is not the rate limiting step for erlotinib delivery to the brain which is mainly governed by ABCmediated efflux. Efflux transport of erlotinib persisted despite BBB disruption. challenge for cancer research [3]. Improving the knowledge regarding the physiology of the BBB and how it controls brain permeation of anticancer drugs remains a critical need [4]. The BBB is created by the endothelial cells that form the walls of the brain microvessels [5]. The "physical barrier" component of the BBB results from tight junctions between adjacent endothelial cells [5]. This key feature of the BBB considerably reduces paracellular flux of solutes between the blood and the brain and forces most molecular traffic to
scite is a Brooklyn-based organization that helps researchers better discover and understand research articles through Smart Citations–citations that display the context of the citation and describe whether the article provides supporting or contrasting evidence. scite is used by students and researchers from around the world and is funded in part by the National Science Foundation and the National Institute on Drug Abuse of the National Institutes of Health.