2021
DOI: 10.1016/j.resuscitation.2021.04.019
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Impact of rescue collapse on mortality rate in severe accidental hypothermia: A matched-pair analysis

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1

Citation Types

0
16
0

Year Published

2021
2021
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
6

Relationship

1
5

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 10 publications
(16 citation statements)
references
References 23 publications
0
16
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Even large centres rarely treat more than 20 patients annually. The largest studies to date have included only a few hundred patients [ 40 ]. Pooling of data is important to hasten the development of methods for diagnosis, treatment, and outcome prediction.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 2 more Smart Citations
“…Even large centres rarely treat more than 20 patients annually. The largest studies to date have included only a few hundred patients [ 40 ]. Pooling of data is important to hasten the development of methods for diagnosis, treatment, and outcome prediction.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Only 2.4% had a core temperature higher than 28 °C. In patients with core temperatures above 30 °C there was no cardiac arrest solely attributable due to hypothermia [ 38 , 40 ]. In general, a normal level of consciousness correlates with a low risk of hypothermic cardiac arrest [ 41 ].…”
Section: Pathophysiologymentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…Moreover, they report risk factors for rescue collapse. 9 In a retrospective cohort study with a matched-pair analysis, they included patients from the HELP (Hypothermic Extracorporeal Life Support in Poland) registry. This Polish registry includes hypothermic patients, mostly arrested and rewarmed with ECLS.…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…This Polish registry includes hypothermic patients, mostly arrested and rewarmed with ECLS. 9,10 The control group (with hypothermia stage III) included 45 patients who did not arrest during standard non-ECLS rewarming. The RC group included 45 hypothermic patients who suffered witnessed CA who were rewarmed with ECLS.…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%