2005
DOI: 10.1021/pr050084g
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Impact of Replicate Types on Proteomic Expression Analysis

Abstract: In expression proteomics, the samples utilized within an experimental design may include technical, biological, or pooled replicates. This manuscript discusses various experimental designs and the conclusions that can be drawn from them. Specifically, it addresses the impact of mixing replicate types on the statistical analysis which can be performed. This study focuses on difference gel electrophoresis (DiGE), but the issues are equally applicable to all quantitative methodologies assessing relative changes i… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

1
150
0

Year Published

2008
2008
2019
2019

Publication Types

Select...
4
4

Relationship

0
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 145 publications
(152 citation statements)
references
References 23 publications
(46 reference statements)
1
150
0
Order By: Relevance
“…2001; Karp et al. 2005), with the “genotype” being a generic term for the three populations (JJ, TT and VV). ANOVA results are shown in Table 1 and both the “genotype” and “spot” were significant ( P  < 0.05).…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…2001; Karp et al. 2005), with the “genotype” being a generic term for the three populations (JJ, TT and VV). ANOVA results are shown in Table 1 and both the “genotype” and “spot” were significant ( P  < 0.05).…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…As previous described (Karp et al. 2005), only spots presented in all three technical replicates were analyzed (Diz and Skibinski 2007). To compare the three populations, a two‐sided analysis of variance (ANOVA) was used, to include “spot” and “genotype” factors (Di et al.…”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Such issues have only recently begun to be addressed in a serious fashion (see eg. [Hu et al, 2005], [Karp et al, 2005], [Wagner et al, 2004], [Vitzthum et al, 2005], [West-Nielsen et al, 2005]). It also seems in some sense wasteful to capture a complete proteomic spectrum containing potentially thousands of components when only a handful of known components will ultimately be used for diagnosis.…”
Section: Overviewmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Proteomics: Protein was extracted from 12 adult male Drosophila aged between 1 and 2 days using protocols and statistical analyses described previously (Karp et al 2005). Protein concentration was determined at the Cambridge Centre for Proteomics (CCP) using the BioRad DC protein assay (Bio-Rad).…”
Section: Ey01983mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Standardized abundance was calculated by dividing spot volumes by the Cy2 internal standard for each spot. Statistical analysis was applied using standard ANOVA (Karp et al 2005). Spots with P , 0.05 for random occurrence were considered to differ significantly between samples.…”
Section: Ey01983mentioning
confidence: 99%