“…39 In addition, the current study used single questions to evaluate religiosity/ spirituality, whereas earlier studies have examined these characteristics using suitable and validated scales of religious/ spiritual beliefs. 21 Finally, the definition of MBRFs, as well as their cut-off points, might differ to those reported in other studies. 5 Despite these limitations however, the current report provides useful information about the relationship of religiosity and prayer use with MBRFs for chronic disease in European populations and allows comparisons with studies '3' or '4' factors) was used as a categorical dependent variable and gender (males, females), age (50e59, 60e69, 70e79 and 80 þ years), living status (living alone, with partner/spouse), education status (0e7, 8e12 and 13þ years), health conditions (none, 1e2 and 3þ), European regions (North, Central, South), self-rated health status (very good/good, fair, bad/very bad), income levels (country-specific quartiles), religious education (no, yes), religious faith (religious, non-religious) and prayer use (!1 time/day, 1e2 times/week, <1 time/week, never) were used as categorical (ordinal) independent predictors.…”