2016
DOI: 10.1061/(asce)st.1943-541x.0001562
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Impact of Reinforcement Ratio and Loading Type on the Deformation Capacity of High-Performance Fiber-Reinforced Cementitious Composites Reinforced with Mild Steel

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
4
1

Citation Types

2
19
0

Year Published

2016
2016
2022
2022

Publication Types

Select...
4
1
1

Relationship

1
5

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 65 publications
(21 citation statements)
references
References 31 publications
2
19
0
Order By: Relevance
“…In general, increasing reinforcement ratios reduced the deformation capacity and ductility of RC beams. However, the ultimate drift ratios of RECC beams under cyclic loading were enhanced from 12 to 17% by an increase in reinforcement ratio from 0.73 to 1.5% . Moreover, cyclic loading further reduced the deformation capacity of RECC beams compared to that under monotonic loading and this effect was correlated with the reinforcement ratio.…”
Section: Experimental Study Of Seismic Behavior Of Recc and Rc/ecc Comentioning
confidence: 90%
See 3 more Smart Citations
“…In general, increasing reinforcement ratios reduced the deformation capacity and ductility of RC beams. However, the ultimate drift ratios of RECC beams under cyclic loading were enhanced from 12 to 17% by an increase in reinforcement ratio from 0.73 to 1.5% . Moreover, cyclic loading further reduced the deformation capacity of RECC beams compared to that under monotonic loading and this effect was correlated with the reinforcement ratio.…”
Section: Experimental Study Of Seismic Behavior Of Recc and Rc/ecc Comentioning
confidence: 90%
“…However, the ultimate drift ratios of RECC beams under cyclic loading were enhanced from 12 to 17% by an increase in reinforcement ratio from 0.73 to 1.5%. 39 Moreover, cyclic loading further reduced the deformation capacity of RECC beams compared to that under monotonic loading 36 and this effect was correlated with the reinforcement ratio. For beams with reinforcement ratio in the range of 0.54-2.0%, deformation capacity was reduced by 30-67% under the FEMA cyclical…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 93%
See 2 more Smart Citations
“…Although reinforced HPFRCC components often exhibit higher strength and displacement capacity when compared to traditional concrete, research has shown that failure often occurs due to reinforcement fracture as opposed to crushing of the concrete material as is typical in reinforced concrete members [9]. A tensionstiffening effect causes deformation to localize at a single cross section once a dominant crack forms in a reinforced HPFRCC member [10].…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%