2011
DOI: 10.1016/j.enpol.2011.03.053
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Impact of reform and privatization on consumers: A case study of power sector reform in Orissa, India

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1
1

Citation Types

2
7
0

Year Published

2012
2012
2022
2022

Publication Types

Select...
7
2

Relationship

0
9

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 16 publications
(9 citation statements)
references
References 20 publications
2
7
0
Order By: Relevance
“…However, they also show that price increases were relatively small and achieved with significant improvements in service quality. Kundu and Mishra (2011) reach a similar conclusion for India where prices decreased -except for farmers which include many poor -and quality increased.…”
Section: On Equity and Fairnesssupporting
confidence: 58%
“…However, they also show that price increases were relatively small and achieved with significant improvements in service quality. Kundu and Mishra (2011) reach a similar conclusion for India where prices decreased -except for farmers which include many poor -and quality increased.…”
Section: On Equity and Fairnesssupporting
confidence: 58%
“…4,5 The impacts of these reforms have been mixed. Some claim that, despite an increase in tariffs, the quality of electricity service remains low (Dubash & Rajan, 2001), and others argue that the quality and availability of power to sectors aside from agriculture improved after a reduction in the agricultural electricity subsidy (Kundu & Mishra, 2011).…”
Section: Historical Background: Electricity Sector and Subsidiesmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…This, in turn, had knock on consequences and denuded revenues that would otherwise have been set aside for re-investment and capacity enhancement in the sector. Perhaps most disappointing of all, however, was the fact that the OERC found itself unable to change political subsidisation in the sector, setting in place tariff structures that once again resulted in financial losses (Thillai 2003;Ruet 2006;Kundu and Mishra 2011).…”
Section: Second Phase: the World Bank Push And Distribution Reformsmentioning
confidence: 97%