2012
DOI: 10.1016/j.enpol.2012.02.026
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Impact of reform and privatisation on employees a case study of power sector reform in Orissa, India

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
1

Citation Types

0
4
0

Year Published

2015
2015
2021
2021

Publication Types

Select...
3
2

Relationship

0
5

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 5 publications
(4 citation statements)
references
References 16 publications
0
4
0
Order By: Relevance
“…The performance and efficiency analysis of Indian electricity generation companies supported the policy of unbundling the power sector while state owned companies appeared inefficient (Jain et al, 2010). However, privatisation brought about different impacts among employees productivity in the state of Orissa as some employees felt benefits while others did not (Kundu and Mishra, 2012). In contrast, technical performance in the Thai electricity industry was found to be mainly driven by technological and productivity improvements (Wattana and Sharma, 2011).…”
Section: Impacts Of Reforms On Productivity and Economic Efficiencymentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…The performance and efficiency analysis of Indian electricity generation companies supported the policy of unbundling the power sector while state owned companies appeared inefficient (Jain et al, 2010). However, privatisation brought about different impacts among employees productivity in the state of Orissa as some employees felt benefits while others did not (Kundu and Mishra, 2012). In contrast, technical performance in the Thai electricity industry was found to be mainly driven by technological and productivity improvements (Wattana and Sharma, 2011).…”
Section: Impacts Of Reforms On Productivity and Economic Efficiencymentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Tariff order also rationalized electricity pricing by lowering the cross-subsidies between industrial and residential customers while unbundling lowered the cross-subsidy between industrial and agricultural customers. In Orissa, the average electricity tariff increased from 1991 to 2001 (Kundu and Mishra, 2011). However, the price of electricity sharply increased particularly for agricultural customers after reforms due to the abolishment of government subsidies.…”
Section: Impacts Of Reforms On Electricity Pricingmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…However, government has been interested in inviting private capital for designing, building, operating and maintaining infrastructure for providing public service (Kale, 2014; Prayas (Energy Group), 2019). However, there are drawbacks in full privatization, such as loss of government control, an effect on public sector employees and inability to reach the rural mass (Kundu and Mishra, 2012). Even where governments do find the resources to subsidize public utility service, large sectors of the population remain unserved (Kale, 2014).…”
Section: Conceptual Frameworkmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The performance and efficiency analysis of the Indian generation companies supported the policy of unbundling the sector while state owned companies appeared inefficient (Jain et al, 2010). However, privatisation brought about different impacts on employee productivity in the state of Orissa as some employees benefitted while others did not (Kundu and Mishra, 2012). In contrast, technical performance in the Thai electricity industry was mainly driven by technological and productivity improvements (Wattana and Sharma, 2011).…”
Section: Impacts Of Reforms On Productivity and Economic Efficiencymentioning
confidence: 99%