1988
DOI: 10.1016/s0022-3476(88)80659-0
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Impact of recurrent otitis media on middle ear function, hearing, and language

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1

Citation Types

1
24
0
1

Year Published

1990
1990
2007
2007

Publication Types

Select...
5
3
1

Relationship

0
9

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 59 publications
(26 citation statements)
references
References 19 publications
1
24
0
1
Order By: Relevance
“…The study by Wright and colleagues93 had several methodological weaknesses. Recruitment occurred in the context of a study on vaccinations, leading to possible “volunteer bias.” Follow up of the original sample fell below 50%, and blinding of language assessors to otitis history was not mentioned.…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The study by Wright and colleagues93 had several methodological weaknesses. Recruitment occurred in the context of a study on vaccinations, leading to possible “volunteer bias.” Follow up of the original sample fell below 50%, and blinding of language assessors to otitis history was not mentioned.…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Wright et al 20 did not find an association between OME and speech and language scores in children 2 years old. Friel-Patti and Finitzo 9 found effects on receptive language in 1-year-old children and effects on expressive language in 1 1 ⁄2-year-old children; however, there were no effects during the other periods, ie, between 1 and 2 years old.…”
mentioning
confidence: 89%
“…Despite the fact that the PLS had some psychometric limitations, it had been commonly used in other investigations of OME (e.g. Teele et al 1984, Wright et al 1988. We wanted to compare our data to the ndings from those studies.…”
Section: Participantsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Several studies have reported comprehension and production problems in children with histories of OME (Holm and Kunze 1969, Teele et al 1984, Friel-Patti and Finitzo 1990. Others have reported no signi cant de cits on language comprehension or language production skills (Bishop and Edmudson 1986, Wright et al 1988, Roberts et al 1991, Grievink et al 1993, Scheilder 1993. More puzzling are reports of production de cits, but not comprehension problems (Menyuk 1986, Wallace et al 1988).…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%