2020
DOI: 10.1016/j.hemonc.2020.02.006
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Impact of RB1 gene mutation type in retinoblastoma patients on clinical presentation and management outcome

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
2
1

Citation Types

1
8
0
1

Year Published

2020
2020
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
7
1

Relationship

0
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 20 publications
(11 citation statements)
references
References 23 publications
1
8
0
1
Order By: Relevance
“…The present study also supported the potential use of age at diagnosis as a risk factor for inherited RB. Recently, NGS is considered a highly sensitive and efficient approach for the detection of RB1 mutations due to increasing use of NGS in gene mutation analysis of RB; especially screening and identification of RB1 mutations with NGS substantially benefits the prepotency, early diagnosis and treatment of retinoblastoma (20)(21)(22)(23)(24)(25). Furthermore, the sensitivity rate of NGS in the present study was similar with that reported to previous studies.…”
Section: Discussionsupporting
confidence: 88%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…The present study also supported the potential use of age at diagnosis as a risk factor for inherited RB. Recently, NGS is considered a highly sensitive and efficient approach for the detection of RB1 mutations due to increasing use of NGS in gene mutation analysis of RB; especially screening and identification of RB1 mutations with NGS substantially benefits the prepotency, early diagnosis and treatment of retinoblastoma (20)(21)(22)(23)(24)(25). Furthermore, the sensitivity rate of NGS in the present study was similar with that reported to previous studies.…”
Section: Discussionsupporting
confidence: 88%
“…The combination of the aforementioned methods is essential for detecting all possible RB1 mutations (17)(18)(19). Recently, Next Generation Sequencing (NGS) has been implemented as rapid and effective strategy for identification of RB1 mutations since all variations can be detected in a single test, thus providing a number of advantages, including high sensitivity and cost-effectiveness (20)(21)(22)(23)(24)(25). In Vietnam, Sanger sequencing coupled with MLPA (SS-MLPA) could detect germline RB1 mutations in 82-84% of bilateral cases (26,27).…”
Section: Clinical Evaluation Of Rb1 Genetic Testing Reveals Novel Mutations In Vietnamese Patients With Retinoblastomamentioning
confidence: 99%
“…It is important to determine whether the detected mutation is a true germline mutation versus a mosaic mutation as the parents and siblings do not require screening in the setting of mosaicism (8); further, the percentage of mosaicism can also help to stratify the risk of second tumors to the child. Somatic RB1 mutations are not routinely identified in RB although there is some evidence that particular mutations, notably deletions, acceptor splice sites and frameshift mutations, may present with more aggressive forms of the disease (9). Beyond biallelic RB1 inactivation, somatic copy number alterations (SCNAs) are thought to contribute to RB tumor growth and progression (10).…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Accumulating evidence has reported the function of RB1 in RB (24,30,31). The main research goal of the present study was to investigate the role of the miR-338-3p/NOVA1 axis in RB.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 94%