2018
DOI: 10.1016/j.ecoleng.2017.06.047
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Impact of rainfall regime on methane flux from a cool temperate fen depends on vegetation cover

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
7
1

Year Published

2018
2018
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
9

Relationship

1
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 14 publications
(8 citation statements)
references
References 72 publications
0
7
1
Order By: Relevance
“…Under field conditions, CH 4 production in deeper peat layers would contribute to overall emissions, while hydraulic lift could maintain moisture content in the peat surface layer under dry conditions. Interestingly, our findings contrast those from Radu and Duval (2018a). They found that more extreme regimes increased CH 4 emission overall and stipulated that rainfall oscillations stimulated the build-up of labile substrate as result of aerobe respiration, which upon repeated rewetting boost CH 4 production.…”
Section: Methane Emissionscontrasting
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…Under field conditions, CH 4 production in deeper peat layers would contribute to overall emissions, while hydraulic lift could maintain moisture content in the peat surface layer under dry conditions. Interestingly, our findings contrast those from Radu and Duval (2018a). They found that more extreme regimes increased CH 4 emission overall and stipulated that rainfall oscillations stimulated the build-up of labile substrate as result of aerobe respiration, which upon repeated rewetting boost CH 4 production.…”
Section: Methane Emissionscontrasting
confidence: 99%
“…We observed that rewetting during the resilience phase led to a steep increase in CH 4 flux rates compared to the resistance phase which tended to be restricted in the more extreme precipitation treatments. Although these results indicate that more extreme rainfall reduces the CH 4 emissions from peatlands, the contrasting results from Radu and Duval (2018a) and the variable rewetting responses between peatland types (Turetsky et al, 2014) make further investigation of gas flux responses to shifting rainfall across peatland types under field conditions advisable.…”
Section: Methane Emissionsmentioning
confidence: 87%
“…Water table positions were allowed to naturally fluctuate. Further details on core collection and experimental setup can be found in Radu and Duval (2017).…”
Section: Laboratory Experimentsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…In addition to the direct effects of climate and hydrology on peatland C cycling and autogenic hydrological feedbacks that occur within peatlands (Waddington et al, 2015), changes in temperature and water table also indirectly influence C cycling through changes in the relative abundance and productivity of dominant plant functional types (PFTs; bryophyte, graminoid and ericoid) (Gavazov et al, 2018; Laine et al, 2011; Riutta, Korrensalo, Laine, Laine, & Tuittila, 2020). Warmer and drier conditions are predicted to favour a shift from bryophyte to vascular plant dominance (Buttler et al, 2015; Dieleman, Branfireun, McLaughlin, & Lindo, 2015; Walker, Ward, Ostle, & Bardgett, 2015), with implications for microclimates and GHG emissions (Gavazov et al, 2018; Radu & Duval, 2018; Robroek et al, 2015; Ward et al, 2013). However, a mechanistic explanation of PFT effects on the sensitivity of the peatland C balance to environmental change remains elusive (Robroek et al, 2016).…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%