2023
DOI: 10.1088/1742-6596/2438/1/012093
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Impact of quantum noise on the training of quantum Generative Adversarial Networks

Abstract: Current noisy intermediate-scale quantum devices suffer from various sources of intrinsic quantum noise. Overcoming the effects of noise is a major challenge, for which different error mitigation and error correction techniques have been proposed. In this paper, we conduct a first study of the performance of quantum Generative Adversarial Networks (qGANs) in the presence of different types of quantum noise, focusing on a simplified use case in high-energy physics. In particular, we explore the effects of reado… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
1

Citation Types

0
4
0

Year Published

2023
2023
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
6

Relationship

1
5

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 7 publications
(4 citation statements)
references
References 5 publications
0
4
0
Order By: Relevance
“…In the current NISQ era, relatively high hardware error levels are one of the primary limitations to effectively employing algorithms on real quantum devices. Similar as in the classical case, QML models appear to be noise resilient to some degree of hardware errors [37][38][39][40]. In the following, the robustness of the QAG model to simulated noise is tested in inference and training.…”
Section: Quantum Noise Studymentioning
confidence: 95%
“…In the current NISQ era, relatively high hardware error levels are one of the primary limitations to effectively employing algorithms on real quantum devices. Similar as in the classical case, QML models appear to be noise resilient to some degree of hardware errors [37][38][39][40]. In the following, the robustness of the QAG model to simulated noise is tested in inference and training.…”
Section: Quantum Noise Studymentioning
confidence: 95%
“…[15,20] This method involves measuring the conditional probability at each ground state and creating a response matrix for estimating the expected value of the true observables, which can mitigate readout errors in QGAN. [21] However, the process of measuring the bias for each ground state requires a significant consumption of measurement shots, making it impractical for scenarios with limited measurement budgets and medium to large-scale quantum circuits. [15,16,22] To address the above problems, we use an efficient and economical method called bit-flip averaging (BFA).…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…In this simulation, we do not consider readout errors caused by phase flips because they have no effect on the statistical results of the quantum circuit. [21,23] For the error mitigation process, we follow two main steps. Firstly, we analyze the influence of noise on the quantum circuit and compute the response matrix using the BFA model.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Recently, this new technology has been applied to various HEP problems (Guan et al, 2021). Namely, in event reconstruction (Das et al, 2019;Shapoval and Calafiura, 2019;Bapst et al, 2020;Tüysüz et al, 2020;Wei et al, 2020;Zlokapa et al, 2021a;Funcke et al, 2022), classification tasks (Mott et al, 2017;Belis et al, 2021;Blance and Spannowsky, 2021;Terashi et al, 2021;Wu et al, 2021;Zlokapa et al, 2021b;Araz and Spannowsky, 2022;Chen et al, 2022;Gianelle et al, 2022), data generation (Chang et al, 2021a,b;Delgado and Hamilton, 2022;Borras et al, 2023;Rehm et al, 2023), and anomaly detection problems (Ngairangbam et al, 2022;Alvi et al, 2023;Schuhmacher et al, 2023;Woźniak et al, 2023).…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%