Impact of psychological capital (PsyCap) on affective commitment: mediating role of affective well-being

Abstract

Purpose The purpose of this study is to examine the mediating role of affective well-being (AWB) in the relationship between psychological capital (PsyCap) and affective commitment. Design/methodology/approach The sample included 226 employees from diverse Portuguese organizations. Based on a survey, respondents reported their perceptions of own PsyCap, AWB and affective commitment to their organization. Findings Results from structural equation modeling suggested presence of mediation by AWB in the relationship between PsyCap and affective commitment. Practical implications Managers are encouraged to gain from this finding by emphasizing more on the emotional health of individuals to increase their attachment with the company. Originality/value Though there are several studies indicating the positive consequences of PsyCap on employees, studies on how PsyCap affects affective commitment through AWB is scarce. These results advance the broaden-and-build theory by suggesting that the relationship between PsyCap and affective commitment is much more complex.

Mitigating Effect of Psychological Capital on Employees’ Withdrawal Behavior in the Presence of Job Attitudes: Evidence From Five-Star Hotels in Malaysia

“…In a similar vein, Wirawan et al (2020) found that the impact of PsyCap on an employee's JS was significant and positive, with a regression coefficient of (β = 0.32, p < 0.01). More literature in hospitality industry also proved that PsyCap was a predictive construct of job attitudes (e.g., Cheung et al, 2019;Viseu et al, 2020;Ribeiro et al, 2021). Thus, based on the above, the following hypotheses are put forward: H1: Psychological capital can significantly and positively influence organizational commitment among customercontact employees in five-star hotels in Malaysia.…”

“…Such employees also display higher positive job attitudes and lower turnover intention (Abbas et al, 2014). Adequate studies have related PsyCap to job attitudes and turnover intention (Seo and Chung, 2019;Koo et al, 2020;Viseu et al, 2020;Ribeiro et al, 2021). Hence, based on the discussion presented above of the positive effect of PsyCap on employees' job attitudes and negative effect of job attitudes on turnover intention in a mainstream management context, the following hypotheses are put forward: H6: Organizational commitment can significantly mediate the effect of psychological capital on turnover intention among customer-contact employees in five-star hotels in Malaysia.…”

When COVID-19 Is the Invader and Internal Communication Is the Hero: Understanding the Influence of Internal Communication on Individual Performance and Evaluating the Mediating Role of Perceived Support

“…Organisations, in addition to having to focus on reinventing their business, should also be concerned about their employees with respect to POS and IP. Although many authors have tried to establish a clear definition of performance and its predictors and consequences, debate is still ongoing in the academic literature (Montes et al 2003;Ribeiro et al 2021). However, Pang and Lu (2018) proceeded with the idea that for an organisation, performance is one of the ways by which the extent of its effectiveness can be measured, as well as a vital aspect in the setting of goals and objectives.…”

Exploring the effect of psychological capital on teachers’ organizational commitment through interpersonal communication

“…Organizational commitment, among others, is affected by PsyCap. A recent study by scholars indicated that PsyCap has a significant effect on organizational commitment (e.g., Wu & Chen, 2018;Yildiz, 2018;Nguyen & Ngo, 2020;Huynh & Hua, 2020;Surucu et al, 2020;Ribeiro et al, 2021). PsyCap is related to an individuals' positive and developmental state characterized by self-efficacy, optimism, hope, and resilience (Luthans& Youssef-Morgan, 2017).…”