2017
DOI: 10.1504/ijogct.2017.081096
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Impact of proppant diagenesis on shale gas productivity

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1

Citation Types

0
3
0

Year Published

2018
2018
2021
2021

Publication Types

Select...
3

Relationship

0
3

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 3 publications
(3 citation statements)
references
References 0 publications
0
3
0
Order By: Relevance
“…A large volume of proppants is pumped into the formation to enhance transportation of shale gas from the formation to the wellbore in commercial quantities. Such production requires the complex network of artificial fractures to have sufficient conductivity to sustain the whole period of production . Unfortunately, the techniques for transporting and placing proppants in the formation to hold the fractures exhibit formation damage near the fracture surface that affects fracture packing. Many mechanisms impair the fracture conductivity during the process of fracturing. ,, These include proppant embedment, closure stress effect, , proppant crushing, , cyclic stress, fine migration, proppant pack diagenesis, , and the blockage caused by the gel residue in the proppant pack and gel filter cake at the fracture face. , …”
Section: Application Of Nanotechnology For Formation Damage Controlmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…A large volume of proppants is pumped into the formation to enhance transportation of shale gas from the formation to the wellbore in commercial quantities. Such production requires the complex network of artificial fractures to have sufficient conductivity to sustain the whole period of production . Unfortunately, the techniques for transporting and placing proppants in the formation to hold the fractures exhibit formation damage near the fracture surface that affects fracture packing. Many mechanisms impair the fracture conductivity during the process of fracturing. ,, These include proppant embedment, closure stress effect, , proppant crushing, , cyclic stress, fine migration, proppant pack diagenesis, , and the blockage caused by the gel residue in the proppant pack and gel filter cake at the fracture face. , …”
Section: Application Of Nanotechnology For Formation Damage Controlmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…146−148 Many mechanisms impair the fracture conductivity during the process of fracturing. 145,148,149 These include proppant embedment, 150 closure stress effect, 151,152 proppant crushing, 153,154 cyclic stress, 148 fine migration, 155 proppant pack diagenesis, 156,157 and the blockage caused by the gel residue in the proppant pack and gel filter cake at the fracture face. 158,159 Recent studies have demonstrated that the use of nanoparticles can improve and control formation damage during stimulation 8 compared to conventional methods.…”
Section: Wettability Alterationmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Overview on Extension and Limitations of Macroscopic Darcy's Law for a Single and Multi-Phase Fluid Flow through a Porous Mediumas the wetting and non-wetting phase fluid pressures change dynamically. In such circumstances, the assumption of equilibrium capillary pressure as a function of the difference between the wetting and non-wetting fluid phase fluid pressures needs a relook 38…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%