2019
DOI: 10.1016/j.jacc.2018.11.052
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Impact of Procedure Time on Outcomes of Thrombectomy for Stroke

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
4
1

Citation Types

7
64
4

Year Published

2019
2019
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
5
2

Relationship

1
6

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 108 publications
(83 citation statements)
references
References 23 publications
7
64
4
Order By: Relevance
“…Finally, the heterogeneity in the effect of mTICI-3 reperfusion according to puncture-to-reperfusion time was not shown by the analysis where puncture-to-reperfusion time was included as a continuous variable. This may be because the relationship between clinical outcomes and puncture-to-reperfusion time is not linear, that is, the rate of favorable outcome decreases rapidly as time elapses in the early period of puncture-to-reperfusion time, and it reaches a plateau later 32 . The threshold of puncture-to-reperfusion time in this study is derived from our own registry, and its generalizability has not been confirmed.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Finally, the heterogeneity in the effect of mTICI-3 reperfusion according to puncture-to-reperfusion time was not shown by the analysis where puncture-to-reperfusion time was included as a continuous variable. This may be because the relationship between clinical outcomes and puncture-to-reperfusion time is not linear, that is, the rate of favorable outcome decreases rapidly as time elapses in the early period of puncture-to-reperfusion time, and it reaches a plateau later 32 . The threshold of puncture-to-reperfusion time in this study is derived from our own registry, and its generalizability has not been confirmed.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Although significant from a technical perspective, this reduction in procedure time was not associated with improvement in clinical outcomes using 90 day mRS scores. The likely rationale is that the average procedure duration was low in our cohort where 80% of patients were recanalized within 60 min of groin puncture; therefore, the reduction in procedure time within this first 60 min does not have a significant impact on clinical outcome as shown previously in larger cohort studies 11. Alawieh et al previously reported, using a large cohort of patients, that among patients recanalized within 30 or 60 min of procedure time, changes in procedure time did not independently predict outcome 11.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 67%
“…The likely rationale is that the average procedure duration was low in our cohort where 80% of patients were recanalized within 60 min of groin puncture; therefore, the reduction in procedure time within this first 60 min does not have a significant impact on clinical outcome as shown previously in larger cohort studies 11. Alawieh et al previously reported, using a large cohort of patients, that among patients recanalized within 30 or 60 min of procedure time, changes in procedure time did not independently predict outcome 11. In our cohort, the average procedure time was 24 min which falls within the 30 min window, thus explaining why the technical improvement did not translate into a clinical improvement when assessed by 90 day mRS scores.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 67%
See 2 more Smart Citations