2018
DOI: 10.1111/iju.13806
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Impact of prior local therapy on overall survival in men with metastatic castration‐resistant prostate cancer: Results from Shared Equal Access Regional Cancer Hospital

Abstract: Objectives: To evaluate the impact of previous local treatment on survival in men with newly diagnosed metastatic castration-resistant prostate cancer (mCRPC). Methods: We performed a retrospective study of patients newly diagnosed with mCRPC in the year 2000 or later from eight Veterans Affairs Medical Centers. Patients were categorized based on prior local therapy (none, prostatectomy ± radiation or radiation alone). Overall and cancer specific survival was estimated by the Kaplan-Meier method. Cox proport… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
18
0

Year Published

2018
2018
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
9

Relationship

1
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 17 publications
(18 citation statements)
references
References 32 publications
0
18
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Of the 837 men within the current study cohort, 328 men (39%) did not receive primary localized therapy but immediately initiated systemic therapy. However, it is important to note that immediate hormonal therapy often is the treatment choice for patients with advanced asymptomatic disease who do not pursue local therapy . As such, to the best of our knowledge, the issue of whether local treatment truly impacts the natural progress of the disease or is merely a marker of men who had lower‐volume disease is unknown.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Of the 837 men within the current study cohort, 328 men (39%) did not receive primary localized therapy but immediately initiated systemic therapy. However, it is important to note that immediate hormonal therapy often is the treatment choice for patients with advanced asymptomatic disease who do not pursue local therapy . As such, to the best of our knowledge, the issue of whether local treatment truly impacts the natural progress of the disease or is merely a marker of men who had lower‐volume disease is unknown.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…We thank Poelaert et al . for their comment on our manuscript . We wholeheartedly agree that our study is limited to selection bias in the context of its retrospective design.…”
mentioning
confidence: 55%
“…After the exclusion of 1,073 duplicate articles, 8,538 records were excluded based on the titles or abstracts for various reasons (reviews, letters, case reports, or unrelated to mPCa or unrelated to RT). After reading the remaining 20 articles in full text, 13 articles were excluded because 2 studies focused on the effect of prior LT on mPCa [15,16], 2 studies focused on the effect of LT on mPCa [7,8], 4 studies of repeated research [17][18][19][20], 3 repeated data studies [21][22][23], and 2 papers did not provide adequate data [24,25]. Finally, 7 studies [26][27][28][29][30][31][32] contributed to the systematic review and meta-analysis (Fig.…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%