2008
DOI: 10.1016/j.ejcts.2008.03.057
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Impact of preoperative hemodynamic support on early outcome in patients assisted with paracorporeal Thoratec® ventricular assist device

Abstract: Background: Mechanical circulatory support has become a well-established procedure for some patients with cardiogenic shock. However, patient selection and timing of implantation remains critical. This retrospective study was undertaken to identify preoperative predictors of survival in ICU of patients requiring mechanical circulatory support. Methods: Between 1996 and 2006, 71 patients (61 men, 10 women, aged 41.6 AE 12.2 years) with primary cardiogenic shock were assisted using the paracorporeal Thoratec W V… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

1
4
0

Year Published

2009
2009
2018
2018

Publication Types

Select...
6
1

Relationship

1
6

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 10 publications
(5 citation statements)
references
References 26 publications
1
4
0
Order By: Relevance
“…The 71% successful bridge to transplant rate in this series is similar to that reported previously in the Thoratec IVAD multicenter trial (69%). 13 It is also comparable to the success rate reported with other pulsatile devices, such as the Thoratec PVAD (65%), 17 the HeartMate IP LVAD (71%), 6 and the HeartMate VE (LVAS, 71%). In this series, patients who required biventricular support at the time of LVAD implant had a lower survival (60%), consistent with previous studies demonstrating that patients with increased severity of illness, especially with renal and hepatic failure, are more likely to require BVADs and thus be at a higher risk of death than patients requiring LVAD alone.…”
Section: Discussionsupporting
confidence: 72%
“…The 71% successful bridge to transplant rate in this series is similar to that reported previously in the Thoratec IVAD multicenter trial (69%). 13 It is also comparable to the success rate reported with other pulsatile devices, such as the Thoratec PVAD (65%), 17 the HeartMate IP LVAD (71%), 6 and the HeartMate VE (LVAS, 71%). In this series, patients who required biventricular support at the time of LVAD implant had a lower survival (60%), consistent with previous studies demonstrating that patients with increased severity of illness, especially with renal and hepatic failure, are more likely to require BVADs and thus be at a higher risk of death than patients requiring LVAD alone.…”
Section: Discussionsupporting
confidence: 72%
“…However, the use of catecholamines in acute heart failure may be associated with higher short-and long-term mortality [5,6]. Among catecholamines, retrospective analyses have linked the need for epinephrine to worse outcome in patients with myocardial infarction or treated with mechanical circulatory support [7,8]. More recently, data from a prospective patient cohort [9] and two small randomized trials [10,11] suggest that in cardiogenic shock, epinephrine might be associated with detrimental short-term outcome.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Kirsch et al were more aggressive in utilizing mechanical right ventricular support in patients who underwent LVAD implantation, and 79% of their patients received mechanical right ventricular support. 16 As shown in Table 5, patients who required preoperative PCPS developed right ventricular failure more frequently (36% vs. 15%, P=0.0431) and their total bilirubin level was higher (3.4±5.8 mg/dl vs. 1.6±2.3 mg/dl, P=0.0276) at 1 month after LVAD implantation as compared with patients without preoperative PCPS. These results indicate that some patients who initially required PCPS developed right ventricular failure and hepatic failure after LVAD implantation, which may have been the reasons for the worse survival in patients with preoperative PCPS.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 92%