What is the role and purpose of follow-up for cervical cancer? Is the objective to identify early recurrence? If so, does this lead to a survival advantage? In the treatment of cervical cancer, after primary chemoradiation, few cases of recurrence are salvageable. Only those with central pelvic recurrences are candidates for potentially curative pelvic exenteration. Recurrences elsewhere are rarely amenable to curative therapy. Patients routinely undergo frequent follow-up, spanning years, when, to date, there have been no prospective studies to evaluate the benefits (or risks) of follow-up. History, physical examination (including pelvic examinations), smears of the cervix or vagina, in addition to various imaging studies, are commonly used. These are not only time consuming to the practitioner but potentially costly to the healthcare system with possible adverse psychological consequences for patients. Without proven benefits to follow-up, the use of this practice, applied universally to all patients, should be questioned.In this issue of Cancer, Siva et al 1 report a provocative study, challenging current standards in the post-therapy management of cervical cancer patients. This study, aimed at detecting relapse and determining survival outcomes, prospectively enrolled 105 women during a period of 5 years, with fluorine-18 (F-18) fluorodeoxyglucose (FDG) positronemission tomography (PET) scans performed after chemoradiation for curative intent. The authors found that a complete metabolic response (CMR), noted in 73 patients, was associated with significantly decreased rates of distant failure and prolonged overall survival compared with those with only partial metabolic response (PMR). The overall survival of all patients at 3 and 5 years was 77% and 69%, respectively. In those who achieved a CMR on post-therapy FDG-PET, the overall survival rates were 95% and 91% at 3 and 5 years, respectively, demonstrating the prognostic importance of posttherapy FDG-PET.The stated hypothesis was that the asymptomatic relapse rate at 5 years would be less than 5% in patients who achieved a CMR, making the clinical utility of pelvic examinations low. Indeed, this is what they found, with 6 patients of 73 experiencing relapse and only 1 patient relapsing without symptoms, discovered at routine follow-up, for an asymptomatic relapse rate of 1.6%. Due to the low rate of relapse after CMR, and the unlikelihood that routine physical examination would detect recurrence, the current standard of follow-up may be of less value in these patients, a finding particularly relevant to those patients who find pelvic examinations uncomfortable and anxiety-provoking.The merits of this study include its generalizability, prospective nature, duration of follow-up, and the analysis of factors affecting prognosis. Patients were included with stage Ib to III disease, increasing the external validity of the study. Data points were prospectively collected, although no comparison group was available. The median follow-up was 3 years, during which t...