2016
DOI: 10.1007/s10854-016-5587-x
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Impact of post deposition annealing in N2 ambient on structural properties of nanocrystalline hafnium oxide thin film

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2

Citation Types

0
2
0

Year Published

2017
2017
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
4

Relationship

0
4

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 4 publications
(2 citation statements)
references
References 15 publications
0
2
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Their results showed that there were optimal annealing temper atures for different film materials. Interestingly, the results in [133,134] showed that the surface roughness of the thin films increased after annealing as compared to the as-deposited ones, though it might decrease with the annealing temper ature. For example, Husna et al [134] found that σ RMS of the deposited thin films was 6.83, 7.26, 7.20, 14.90 and 8.67 nm annealed 250, 350, 450 and 500 °C, respectively.…”
Section: Effects Of Different Annealing Temperatures On the Surface R...mentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…Their results showed that there were optimal annealing temper atures for different film materials. Interestingly, the results in [133,134] showed that the surface roughness of the thin films increased after annealing as compared to the as-deposited ones, though it might decrease with the annealing temper ature. For example, Husna et al [134] found that σ RMS of the deposited thin films was 6.83, 7.26, 7.20, 14.90 and 8.67 nm annealed 250, 350, 450 and 500 °C, respectively.…”
Section: Effects Of Different Annealing Temperatures On the Surface R...mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…However, many researchers have found that the surface roughness of the deposited films does not always increase with the annealing temperature [131][132][133][134], as shown in table 7. For example, Pandey et al [131] found that σ RMS of the deposited films was 19.70, 8.46, 14.80 and 13.2 nm when T an was 400, 600, 800 and 1000 °C, respectively.…”
Section: Effects Of Different Annealing Temperatures On the Surface R...mentioning
confidence: 99%