2010
DOI: 10.1037/a0016998
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Impact of positive psychological capital on employee well-being over time.

Abstract: The recently recognized core construct of psychological capital or PsyCap (consisting of the positive psychological resources of efficacy, hope, optimism, and resilience) has been demonstrated to be related to various employee attitudinal, behavioral, and performance outcomes. However, to date, the impact of this positive core construct over time and on important employee well-being outcomes has not been tested. This study meets this need by analyzing the relationship between a broad cross-section of employees… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
2

Citation Types

43
566
0
25

Year Published

2011
2011
2017
2017

Publication Types

Select...
5
4
1

Relationship

2
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 722 publications
(667 citation statements)
references
References 101 publications
(170 reference statements)
43
566
0
25
Order By: Relevance
“…However, positive psychological resources, such as efficacy and optimism, counteract the distress from these demands, such that the components of PsyCap act as a suppressor of stress and anxiety. Using this argument, previous research has found negative relationships between PsyCap and stress and anxiety (Avey, Luthans, & Jensen, 2009) as well as positive relationships with psychological well-being (Avey, Luthans, Smith, & Palmer, 2010). Overall, in this meta-analysis we anticipate PsyCap will have a positive relationship with desirable employee attitudes and a negative relationship with undesirable employee attitudes.…”
Section: The Background and Foundation Of Psychological Capitalmentioning
confidence: 86%
“…However, positive psychological resources, such as efficacy and optimism, counteract the distress from these demands, such that the components of PsyCap act as a suppressor of stress and anxiety. Using this argument, previous research has found negative relationships between PsyCap and stress and anxiety (Avey, Luthans, & Jensen, 2009) as well as positive relationships with psychological well-being (Avey, Luthans, Smith, & Palmer, 2010). Overall, in this meta-analysis we anticipate PsyCap will have a positive relationship with desirable employee attitudes and a negative relationship with undesirable employee attitudes.…”
Section: The Background and Foundation Of Psychological Capitalmentioning
confidence: 86%
“…Dichos estados psicológicos han sido ampliamente relacionados con el bienestar (Avey, Luthans, Smith y Palmer, 2010) y también con actitudes y conductas organizacionales positivas tales como la satisfacción laboral, el desempeño y el compromiso organizacional (Luthans, Avolio, Avey y Norman, 2007;Luthans, Norman, Avolio y Avey, 2008;Avey, Luthans y Youssef, 2010;Luthans, Avey, Avolio y Peterson, 2010).…”
Section: Introductionunclassified
“…Further, PsyCap has been found to predict unique variance in important employee attitudes and behaviors over and above their demographics, core-self evaluations, personality traits, and person-organization and person-job fit (Avey, Luthans & Youssef, 2010). There is also a growing number of studies refining and expanding the positive impact of PsyCap on outcomes such as stress (Avey, Luthans & Jensen, 2009), well-being (Avey, Luthans, Smith & Palmer, 2010), team effectiveness (Walumbwa, Luthans, Avey & Oke, 2011), and organizational change (Avey, Wernsing & Luthans, 2008). However, missing from this rapidly expanding research literature is the impact that PsyCap may have on problem-solving and innovation, and the role that PsyCap may have when integrated with OB Mod in positively impacting these complex areas of problem solving and innovation.…”
Section: Positive Organizational Behavior and Psychological Capitalmentioning
confidence: 99%