2016
DOI: 10.1007/s10825-016-0851-0
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Impact of phonon scattering in Si/GaAs/InGaAs nanowires and FinFets: a NEGF perspective

Abstract: This paper reviews our previous theoretical studies and gives further insight into phonon scattering in 3D small nanotransistors using non-equilibrium Green function methodology. The focus is on very small gate-all-around nanowires with Si, GaAs or InGaAs cores. We have calculated phonon-limited mobility and transfer characteristics for a variety of cross-sections at low and high drain bias. The nanowire cross-sectional area is shown to have a significant impact on the phonon-limited mobility and on the curren… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

1
15
0

Year Published

2017
2017
2022
2022

Publication Types

Select...
6

Relationship

2
4

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 11 publications
(16 citation statements)
references
References 41 publications
1
15
0
Order By: Relevance
“…The source potential is given by the N=0 in the first series of equation (24). The image locations along the y-axis and charge assignments are: For a separation of source charge and field point ρ=10d (where here d=2b is the distance between the two conducting slabs) and an accuracy in the potential of the order of 1% requires ~ 10 8 image charges, a result first observed in reference [6]. This slow convergence disappears for shorter distances between the source charge and the field point, precisely the localised regime where the self-energy is defined.…”
Section: Dielectric Sandwiched Between Two Conducting Slabsmentioning
confidence: 83%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…The source potential is given by the N=0 in the first series of equation (24). The image locations along the y-axis and charge assignments are: For a separation of source charge and field point ρ=10d (where here d=2b is the distance between the two conducting slabs) and an accuracy in the potential of the order of 1% requires ~ 10 8 image charges, a result first observed in reference [6]. This slow convergence disappears for shorter distances between the source charge and the field point, precisely the localised regime where the self-energy is defined.…”
Section: Dielectric Sandwiched Between Two Conducting Slabsmentioning
confidence: 83%
“…For dielectric heterostructures with regions with nanometer dimensions the electrostatic self-energies of carriers and charged impurities may be high (meV to a few eV, [1]). Here we focus on semiconductor nanostructures including wrapround-gate field effect nanowire transistors [2][3][4][5][6] but the following is applicable also to biological systems such as ion channels and to molecular heterostructures including carbon nanostructures. For semiconductor nanostructures the electrostatic self-energy (when considered at all) is generally pre-computed numerically along with a tight-binding evaluation of nanostructure energy band structure [7].…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…We have considered the acoustic and optical (for f-type and g-type) intervalley scattering mechanisms, as well as the intra-valley elastic acoustic phonons scattering mechanism. The specific parameters and models used can be found in references [85,86]. The electrostatic potential is calculated from the Poisson equation in the mean field approximation.…”
Section: Device Structure and The 1d Representationmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The calculation of phonon modes in confined nanostructures is also a challenge, as they strongly depend on the boundary conditions used [99]. In our study, the acoustic deformation potential has been parameterised to partially take care of the decrease in mobility for narrow nanowire following [86,98]. Using a heat equation has the advantage of extending thermal simulations in larger regions surrounding the device and interconnects.…”
Section: Perspectives and Challengesmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…In fact, instead of the recondite mathematical language, the governing equation in NEGF formalism can be regarded as a modified Schrödinger equation with an appropriate boundary condition. To make the simulation more practical, the solver has considered multiple scattering mechanisms including electron‐phonon, ionized impurity (IMP), and surface roughness (SR) scattering.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%