Impact of personality on the decision process and on satisfaction rates in pseudophakic presbyopic correction

Ntonti, Panagiota; Bakirtzis, Minas; Delibasis, Konstantinos K.; Seimenis, Ioannis; Tsinopoulos, Ioannis; Labiris, Georgios

doi:10.1097/j.jcrs.0000000000001021

Cited by 3 publications

(3 citation statements)

References 25 publications

(42 reference statements)

Supporting

Mentioning

Contrasting

Order By: Relevance

“…Another study evaluating pseudophakic presbyopic corrections found openness to experience, conscientiousness and extraversion to be major contributors to satisfaction rates. 10 In contrast with our findings, Mester et al found compulsive checking, orderliness, competence, and dutifulness to be correlated to the perception of halos and glare after mIOL implantation. 11 However, investigators did not attribute a score to each one of the Big Five personality traits, instead, identified four psychometric characteristics to have a significant impact on patient satisfaction.…”

Section: Discussioncontrasting

confidence: 99%

“…8 Recently, two authors have proven that personality significantly influences patients’ satisfaction after mIOL. 9,10 In addition, Mester et al found a relationship between personality traits and the perception of visual disturbances. 11 Despite the increasing interest in the topic, there is still a paucity of research towards patients’ personality traits and whether they can influence subjective disturbances caused by photic phenomena and there is a lack of standardization in both methods for evaluating visual symptoms and in personality questionnaires’ scores.…”

Section: Introductionmentioning

confidence: 99%

See 1 more Smart Citation

The influence of personality on the quality of vision after multifocal intraocular lens implantation

Pinheiro

Raimundo

Gil

et al. 2023

European Journal of Ophthalmology

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

Objective To assess the possible correlation between patients’ personality traits and subjective perception of quality of vision (QoV), after multifocal intraocular lens (mIOL) implantation. Methods patients who had bilateral implantation of a non-diffractive X-WAVE or a trifocal lens were assessed 6 months postoperatively. Patients answered the NEO-Five Factor Inventory (NEO-FFI-20) questionnaire (“Big Five five-factor personality model”) to examine their personality. Six months following surgery, patients were asked to fill a QoV questionnaire where they graded the frequency of 10 common visual symptoms. Primary outcomes were to evaluate the correlation between personality scores and the reported frequency of visual disturbances. Results The study comprised 20 patients submitted to bilateral cataract surgery, 10 with a non-diffractive X-WAVE lens (AcrySof® IQ Vivity) and 10 with a trifocal lens (AcrySof® IQ PanOptix). Mean age was 60.23 (7.06) years. Six months following surgery, patients with lower scores of conscientiousness and extroversion reported a higher frequency of visual disturbances (blurred vision, P = .015 and P = .009, seeing double images P = .018 and P = .006, and having difficulties focusing, P = .027 and P = .022, respectively). In addition, patients with high neuroticism scores had more difficulty focusing ( P = .033). Conclusions In this study, personality traits such as low conscientiousness and extroversion and high neuroticism significantly influenced QoV perception 6 months after bilateral multifocal lens implantation. Patients’ personality questionnaires could be a useful preoperative assessment test to a mIOL.

show abstract

Section: Discussioncontrasting

confidence: 99%

Section: Introductionmentioning

confidence: 99%

The influence of personality on the quality of vision after multifocal intraocular lens implantation

Pinheiro

Raimundo

Gil

et al. 2023

European Journal of Ophthalmology

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

show abstract

“…Our long-term experience in premium pseudophakic corrections suggests that mesopic pupils below 5 mm, chord-mu below 0.4 mm, coma <0.32, and exclusion of professional night workers almost guard against the disturbing postoperative dysphotopsia. 7,20 Therefore, we were able to design a truly randomized trial since we were confident that the subjective perceptions of the patients that were derived by the NEI-VFQ 25 would mostly reflect the postoperative quantity of vision and would not be significantly affected by any quality-of-vision issues.…”

Section: Discussionmentioning

confidence: 99%

Mix-and-match vs bilateral trifocal and bilateral EDOF intraocular lens implantation: the spline curve battle

Labiris,

Panagis,

Ntonti

et al. 2024

J Cataract Refract Surg

Self Cite

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

Purpose: To compare the postoperative vision acuity curves following three pseudophakic presbyopic correction techniques. Setting: Department of Ophthalmology, University Hospital of Alexandroupolis, Alexandroupolis, Greece Design: Prospective, randomized, comparative trial Methods: Stage 2 LOCS-III Cataract patients populated three study groups: a) Premium Monovision Group who received the Panoptix intraocular lens (IOL) in the recessive eye and the Vivity IOL in the dominant one, b) Bilateral Trifocal Group who received bilaterally the Panoptix IOL, and, c) Bilateral xEDOF Group who received bilaterally the Vivity IOL. Postoperative bilateral uncorrected vision acuity (UVA) was measured at 25.5, 28, 33, 40, 50, 66, 100, 200 and 300cm distances. Spline curve fitting was attempted and areas of the curves (AOC) and Curvatures k were calculated. All patients responded to the NEI-VFQ-25 questionnaire. Results: 90 patients populated equally the three groups. Premium monovision and bilateral trifocal implantation delivered similar visual acuity (all AOC p>0.05); however the trifocal patients suffered from vision acuity drops in certain distance ranges as expressed in negative curvature values. Bilateral xEDOF patients demonstrated worse near vision acuity (p<0.05). Premium monovision patients reported better scores in NEI-VFQ 25 (p=0.03) and in the near activities (p=0.02) and distant activities subscales (p=0.04). Conclusion: All surgical options provide impressive outcomes. Premium monovision seems to deliver the best results.

show abstract

An update of recommendations for follow-up care following unsuccessful cataract surgery

Kaur,

Balaji,

Titiyal

et al. 2023

Expert Review of Ophthalmology

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

Impact of personality on the decision process and on satisfaction rates in pseudophakic presbyopic correction

Abstract: To explore the impact of personality on the decision process and satisfaction rates in pseudophakic presbyopic correction.

Cited by 3 publications

References 25 publications

The influence of personality on the quality of vision after multifocal intraocular lens implantation

The influence of personality on the quality of vision after multifocal intraocular lens implantation

Mix-and-match vs bilateral trifocal and bilateral EDOF intraocular lens implantation: the spline curve battle

An update of recommendations for follow-up care following unsuccessful cataract surgery

Contact Info

Product

Resources

About