2023
DOI: 10.1016/j.gie.2022.10.039
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Impact of peroral endoscopic myotomy on high-resolution manometry findings and their association with the procedure’s outcomes

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3

Citation Types

0
2
0

Year Published

2023
2023
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
5

Relationship

0
5

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 5 publications
(3 citation statements)
references
References 42 publications
0
2
0
Order By: Relevance
“…We respect that each of these disorders has a different pathophysiology, and, ideally, these distinct disorders should have been analyzed separately. Lastly, post-POEM manometry was not done as the data regarding its utility in this scenario are scarce and do not seem to contribute to the clinical outcome or patient quality of life 25 …”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…We respect that each of these disorders has a different pathophysiology, and, ideally, these distinct disorders should have been analyzed separately. Lastly, post-POEM manometry was not done as the data regarding its utility in this scenario are scarce and do not seem to contribute to the clinical outcome or patient quality of life 25 …”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Lastly, post-POEM manometry was not done as the data regarding its utility in this scenario are scarce and do not seem to contribute to the clinical outcome or patient quality of life. 25…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Even though the median of post-POEM IRP was higher than 15 mmHg (17.2 mmHg) but Eckardt score was lower than 3 can be explained by a multicenter, observational cohort study reported by Hata Y et al 21 studied the associations between post-POEM HREM and the outcomes of POEM. 7% (151 of 2,171 patients) showed residual high post-POEM IRP (≥ 26 mmHg; Starlet [Starmedical Ltd, Tokyo, Japan]) still have comparable clinical outcome with low post-POEM IRP patients.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%