Impact of peer-delivered tuition/feedback on appointment to United Kingdom Higher Surgical Training

Abstract

Background In the United Kingdom, Core Surgical Trainees (or equivalent) undergo a rigorous National Selection (NS) process to secure a ST3 Training Post in General or Vascular Surgery. Despite a decrease in competition ratio from 3:1 in 2012 to 1.48:1 in 2017, many applicants were unable to secure ST3 Training Posts. We hypothesise that this is due to applicant performance anxiety rather than lack of clinical experience. Methods This is a prospective observational study following 27 delegates who have completed a 2-day course consisting of didactic lecture and interactive practice with a 1:1 faculty:delegate ratio. The course was delivered by surgical consultants and trainees. A specific mentor was nominated to oversee the delegate’s progress throughout and post course. Personalised feedback was given by the entire faculty throughout the course. Delegates were asked to complete evaluation forms to track their perceived confidence levels of success at NS at different timeframes, measured by a visual analogue scale. Paired t -test was performed to compare the mean confidence level pre- and post- course. Results Evaluation forms were received from all (n = 27) delegates. Delegate self-reported confidence increased significantly for all domains except Professional Communication. 23 (85%) of the participants were successful in the NS post course. There was no statistically significant difference between UK and non-UK graduates; and first time and not-first-time applicants. Conclusions Peer-delivered teaching, practice and feedback as a structured interview practice course can significantly improve applicants’ overall confidence levels in preparing for the UK ST3 General and Vascular Surgery NS. Improvement in confidence levels translates to high attrition rate of ST3 Training Posts. Communication skills require longer practice time extending beyond the duration of the 2-day course.