2004
DOI: 10.2310/6640.2004.15341
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Impact of Peer-Coaching on the Clinical Reasoning of the Novice Practitioner

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

3
10
0

Year Published

2007
2007
2022
2022

Publication Types

Select...
8

Relationship

0
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 13 publications
(13 citation statements)
references
References 0 publications
3
10
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Peer learning is a term often used in 275 Skøien et al /Physiotherapy Theory and Practice 25 (2009) 268-278 Physiother Theory Pract Downloaded from informahealthcare.com by University of South Florida on 11/03/14 relation to learning between students in practical settings (Falchikov, 2001). This is in line with the importance of collaborative learning in clinical placements, reported in several other studies (Baldry Currens, 2003;DeClute and Ladyshewsky, 1993;Moore, Morris, Crouch, and Martin, 2003;Ladyshewsky, 2004;Lindquist et al, 2006). The presence of fellow students allows the students to express their feelings about clinical experiences, help each other, share responsibility, and have someone to call upon when uncertain (Bennett, 2003;Stiller, Lynch, Phillips, and Lambert, 2004).…”
Section: Enough Time and Spacesupporting
confidence: 86%
“…Peer learning is a term often used in 275 Skøien et al /Physiotherapy Theory and Practice 25 (2009) 268-278 Physiother Theory Pract Downloaded from informahealthcare.com by University of South Florida on 11/03/14 relation to learning between students in practical settings (Falchikov, 2001). This is in line with the importance of collaborative learning in clinical placements, reported in several other studies (Baldry Currens, 2003;DeClute and Ladyshewsky, 1993;Moore, Morris, Crouch, and Martin, 2003;Ladyshewsky, 2004;Lindquist et al, 2006). The presence of fellow students allows the students to express their feelings about clinical experiences, help each other, share responsibility, and have someone to call upon when uncertain (Bennett, 2003;Stiller, Lynch, Phillips, and Lambert, 2004).…”
Section: Enough Time and Spacesupporting
confidence: 86%
“…Pyschomotor gains also showed greater improvement in the peer-taught group. The results from Iwasiw & Goldenberg are in line with several other studies suggesting the benefits of peer discussion (Ladyshewsky (2002) and Ladyshewsky (2004)). This value of collaborative support is also seen in the comments from this survery, for example, 'feedback on subjective and clinical reasoning on objective' and 'feedback on area for development'.…”
Section: Ratingsupporting
confidence: 82%
“…Peer coaching was devised to help support the implementation of novel concepts effectively in the classroom. Since its inception, it has been used in the education of healthcare professionals, and specifically physiotherapy with promising results (Ladyshewsky, 2004& Ladyshewsky, 2002. Ladyshewsky (2010) suggests there are many advantages to the peer coaching model including; encouragement of student responsibility for learning, helping students to wean themselves from considering clinical educators as the sole source of knowledge and understanding, opportunity for students to explore alternative problems solutions in a safe environment, development of social interaction and communications skills, enhancement of student satisfaction with the learning experience and enhancement of self-esteem.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Although the MOF was designed as a framework for clinical teachers and students, its principles could easily be applied to peer feedback. Others have demonstrated educational gains through peer feedback systems [ 42 ]. Peers may be able to provide effective additional feedback to the learner, again satisfying the students’ request for increased volumes of feedback.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%