2018
DOI: 10.1016/j.jocs.2017.11.005
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Impact of patient-specific LVOT inflow profiles on aortic valve prosthesis and ascending aorta hemodynamics

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
11
0

Year Published

2018
2018
2021
2021

Publication Types

Select...
8

Relationship

0
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 15 publications
(11 citation statements)
references
References 33 publications
0
11
0
Order By: Relevance
“…The WSS gives a measure of the interaction between blood and artery and correlates with exchange processes such as load acting on the endothelial cells (Bruening et al, 2018). However, the predisposition to high or low WSS-related indices and its relationship with the aortic morphology is still debated and other indices as the helicity has been introduced and discussed (Morbiducci et al, 2009(Morbiducci et al, , 2011(Morbiducci et al, , 2015.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The WSS gives a measure of the interaction between blood and artery and correlates with exchange processes such as load acting on the endothelial cells (Bruening et al, 2018). However, the predisposition to high or low WSS-related indices and its relationship with the aortic morphology is still debated and other indices as the helicity has been introduced and discussed (Morbiducci et al, 2009(Morbiducci et al, , 2011(Morbiducci et al, , 2015.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Indeed, velocity profiles in the LVOT are not plug-like (Garcia et al, 2011). Work by Bruening and colleagues shows that significant overestimation of the pressure drop can occur when assuming a plug-flow velocity profile opposed to a patient-specific flow profile from 4D velocity-encoded MRI (Bruening et al, 2018). However, differences between the full and truncated transient model are small in this study, and the added accuracy of the full model may therefore not outweigh the additional computational cost.…”
Section: Comparison Cfd Modelsmentioning
confidence: 72%
“…However, patient‐specific inflow profiles based on 4D MRI are not typically available. Further, 4D MRI data is challenging to use in CFD simulations because of low resolutions, high signal‐to‐noise ratio, and diagnostic variations arising from respiratory motion, changes in heart rate, and patient position . Thus, specifying physiological velocity conditions at the inlet is a nontrivial task, particularly in complex vascular geometries.…”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%